Langworth S, Anundi H, Friis L, Johanson G, Lind M L, Söderman E, Akesson B A
Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Occupational Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2001 Apr;74(3):213-8. doi: 10.1007/s004200000211.
The aim of this study was to identify possible health effects caused by different cleaning agents used in graffiti removal.
In 38 graffiti removers working 8-h shifts in the Stockholm underground system, the exposure to organic solvents was assessed by active air sampling, biological monitoring, and by interviews and a questionnaire. Health effects were registered, by physical examinations, porta7ble spirometers and self-administered questionnaires. The prevalence of symptoms was compared with 49 controls working at the underground depots, and with 177 population controls.
The 8-h time-weighted average exposures (TWA) were low, below 20% of the Swedish permissible exposure limit value (PEL) for all solvents. The short-term exposures occasionally exceeded the Swedish short-term exposure limit values (STEL), especially during work in poorly ventilated spaces, e.g. in elevators. The graffiti removers reported significantly higher prevalence of tiredness and upper airway symptoms compared with the depot controls, and significantly more tiredness, headaches and symptoms affecting airways, eyes and skin than the population controls. Among the graffiti removers, some of the symptoms increased during the working day. On a group basis, the lung function registrations showed normal values. However, seven workers displayed a clear reduction of peak expiratory flow (PEF) over the working shift.
Though their average exposure to organic solvents was low, the graffiti removers reported significantly higher prevalence of unspecific symptoms such as fatigue and headache as well as irritative symptoms from the eyes and respiratory tract, compared with the controls. To prevent adverse health effects it is important to inform the workers about the health risks, and to restrict use of the most hazardous chemicals. Furthermore, it is important to develop good working practices and to encourage the use of personal protective equipment.
本研究旨在确定去除涂鸦过程中使用的不同清洁剂可能对健康产生的影响。
对在斯德哥尔摩地铁系统工作8小时轮班的38名涂鸦清除员,通过主动空气采样、生物监测、访谈和问卷调查来评估有机溶剂暴露情况。通过体格检查、便携式肺活量计和自行填写的问卷来记录健康影响。将症状的患病率与在地铁车辆段工作的49名对照人员以及177名普通人群对照进行比较。
所有溶剂的8小时时间加权平均暴露量(TWA)较低,低于瑞典允许暴露限值(PEL)的20%。短期暴露偶尔会超过瑞典短期暴露限值(STEL),尤其是在通风不良的空间工作时,例如在电梯内。与车辆段对照相比,涂鸦清除员报告的疲劳和上呼吸道症状患病率显著更高,与普通人群对照相比,疲劳、头痛以及影响呼吸道、眼睛和皮肤的症状明显更多。在涂鸦清除员中,一些症状在工作日期间有所增加。从群体角度来看,肺功能记录显示值正常。然而,有7名工人在整个工作班次中呼气峰值流速(PEF)明显下降。
尽管涂鸦清除员对有机溶剂的平均暴露量较低,但与对照组相比,他们报告的疲劳、头痛等非特异性症状以及眼睛和呼吸道的刺激性症状患病率显著更高。为防止对健康产生不利影响,告知工人健康风险并限制使用最危险的化学品非常重要。此外,制定良好的工作规范并鼓励使用个人防护设备也很重要。