Hawley C A
Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001 Jun;70(6):761-6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.70.6.761.
To determine whether patients who return to driving after head injury can be considered safe to do so and to compare the patient characteristics of those who return to driving with those who do not.
In a multicentre qualitative study 10 rehabilitation units collectively registered 563 adults with traumatic brain injury during a 2.5 year period. Recruitment to the study varied from immediately after hospital admission to several years after injury. Patients and their families were interviewed around 3 to 6 months after recruitment. A total of 383 (67.5%) subjects were interviewed within 1 year of injury, of whom 270 (47.6%) were interviewed within 6 months of injury. Main outcome measures were the presence or absence of driving related problems reported by drivers and ex-drivers, and scores on driving related items of the functional independence/functional assessment measure (FIM+FAM).
Of the 563 patients 381 were drivers before the injury and 139 had returned to driving at interview. Many current drivers reported problems with behaviour (anger, aggression, irritability; 67 (48.2%)), memory ( 89 (64%)), concentration and attention (39 (28.1%)), and vision (39 (28.1%)). Drivers reported most driving related problems as often as ex-drivers, main exceptions were epilepsy and community mobility. Current drivers scored significantly higher on the FIM+FAM (were more independent), than ex-drivers. The driving group had sustained less severe head injuries than ex-drivers; nevertheless, 78 (56.2%) current drivers had received a severe head injury. Few (61 (16%)) previous drivers reported receiving formal advice about driving after injury.
The existence of problems which could significantly affect driving does not prevent patients returning to driving after traumatic brain injury. Patients should be assessed for both mental and physical status before returning to driving after a head injury, and systems put in place to enable clear and consistent advice to be given to patients about driving.
确定头部受伤后恢复驾驶的患者是否可被认为驾车安全,并比较恢复驾驶的患者与未恢复驾驶的患者的特征。
在一项多中心定性研究中,10个康复单位在2.5年期间共登记了563名患有创伤性脑损伤的成年人。研究招募时间从受伤后立即入院到受伤后数年不等。在招募后约3至6个月对患者及其家属进行访谈。共有383名(67.5%)受试者在受伤后1年内接受访谈,其中270名(47.6%)在受伤后6个月内接受访谈。主要结局指标为现职驾驶员和曾经的驾驶员报告的与驾驶相关问题的有无,以及功能独立性/功能评估量表(FIM+FAM)中与驾驶相关项目的得分。
在563名患者中,381名在受伤前为驾驶员,139名在访谈时已恢复驾驶。许多现职驾驶员报告了行为问题(愤怒、攻击性、易怒;67名(48.2%))、记忆问题(89名(64%))、注意力集中问题(39名(28.1%))和视力问题(39名(28.1%))。现职驾驶员报告的大多数与驾驶相关的问题与曾经的驾驶员一样频繁,主要例外是癫痫和社区出行。现职驾驶员在FIM+FAM上的得分显著更高(更独立),高于曾经的驾驶员。驾驶组头部受伤的严重程度低于曾经的驾驶员;然而,78名(56.2%)现职驾驶员曾遭受严重头部损伤。很少有(61名(16%))曾经的驾驶员报告在受伤后收到过关于驾驶的正式建议。
存在可能显著影响驾驶的问题并不妨碍创伤性脑损伤患者恢复驾驶。头部受伤后恢复驾驶前,应对患者的精神和身体状况进行评估,并建立相关系统,以便能向患者提供关于驾驶的清晰且一致的建议。