Suppr超能文献

20世纪90年代烟草游说团体对美国州立法机构的政治影响。

Tobacco lobby political influence on US state legislatures in the 1990s.

作者信息

Givel M S, Glantz S A

机构信息

University of California San Francisco, Institute for Health Policy Studies and Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2001 Jun;10(2):124-34. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.2.124.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Throughout the 1990s the tobacco lobby was a potent political force in US state legislatures advancing its pro-tobacco agenda.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the market and political motivations of the tobacco lobby and the strategies they use to achieve these goals in US state legislatures.

DESIGN

This study is a content analysis and summary overview of recently released historical tobacco industry documents; tobacco related government documents; and recent state tobacco control policy reports.

RESULTS

In the 1990s, the tobacco lobby engaged in a comprehensive and aggressive political effort in state legislatures to sell tobacco with the least hindrance using lobbying, the media, public relations, front groups, industry allies, and contributions to legislators. These efforts included campaigns to neutralise clean indoor air legislation, minimise tax increases, and preserve the industry's freedom to advertise and sell tobacco. The tobacco lobby succeeded in increasing the number of states that enacted state pre-emption of stricter local tobacco control laws and prevented the passage of many state tobacco control policies. Public health advocates were able to prevent pre-emption and other pro-tobacco policies from being enacted in several states.

CONCLUSIONS

The tobacco lobby is a powerful presence in state legislatures. Because of the poor public image of the tobacco lobby, it seeks to wield this power quietly and behind the scenes. State and local health advocates, who often have high public credibility, can use this fact against the tobacco lobby by focusing public attention on the tobacco lobby's political influence and policy goals and expose links between the tobacco lobby and its legislative supporters.

摘要

背景

在整个20世纪90年代,烟草游说团体在美国各州立法机构中是一股强大的政治力量,推动其支持烟草的议程。

目的

描述烟草游说团体的市场和政治动机,以及他们在美国各州立法机构中为实现这些目标所采用的策略。

设计

本研究是对最近发布的历史烟草行业文件、与烟草相关的政府文件以及近期的州烟草控制政策报告进行的内容分析和概述。

结果

在20世纪90年代,烟草游说团体在各州立法机构中展开了全面且积极的政治活动,通过游说、媒体、公共关系、前沿团体、行业盟友以及对立法者的捐款,以最少的阻碍销售烟草产品。这些努力包括开展活动以抵消室内空气清洁立法的影响、尽量减少税收增加,并维护该行业宣传和销售烟草的自由。烟草游说团体成功增加了颁布州一级优先适用更严格地方烟草控制法律的州的数量,并阻止了许多州烟草控制政策的通过。公共卫生倡导者在几个州成功阻止了优先适用及其他支持烟草的政策的颁布。

结论

烟草游说团体在各州立法机构中势力强大,但由于其公众形象不佳而试图在幕后悄悄行使这种权力。州和地方卫生倡导者通常具有较高的公众可信度,可以利用这一点,通过让公众关注烟草游说团体的政治影响力和政策目标,并揭露烟草游说团体与其立法支持者之间的联系,来对抗烟草游说团体。

相似文献

1
Tobacco lobby political influence on US state legislatures in the 1990s.
Tob Control. 2001 Jun;10(2):124-34. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.2.124.
2
Oklahoma tobacco policy-making.
J Okla State Med Assoc. 2005 Mar;98(3):89-94.
3
Tobacco Institute lobbying at the state and local levels of government in the 1990s.
Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):I102-9. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i102.
4
"A phony way to show sincerity, as we all well know": tobacco industry lobbying against tobacco control in Hong Kong.
Tob Control. 2004 Dec;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii13-21. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.007641.
5
Tobacco-control policies in tobacco-growing states: where tobacco was king.
Milbank Q. 2015 Jun;93(2):319-58. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12124.
6
Tobacco industry interference with tobacco control policies in Poland: legal aspects and industry practices.
Tob Control. 2016 Sep;25(5):521-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052582. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
7
State laws on tobacco control--United States, 1998.
MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 1999 Jun 25;48(3):21-40.
9
Tobacco industry allegations of "illegal lobbying" and state tobacco control.
Am J Public Health. 2001 Jan;91(1):62-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.1.62.
10
Boards of Health as venues for clean indoor air policy making.
Am J Public Health. 2002 Feb;92(2):257-65. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.2.257.

引用本文的文献

1
Threaten, Distract, and Discredit: Cannabis Industry Rhetoric to Defeat Regulation of High-THC Cannabis Products in Washington State.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2024 May;85(3):322-329. doi: 10.15288/jsad.23-00277. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
2
Combatting tobacco industry lobbyists in public health.
Tob Induc Dis. 2023 Oct 20;21:137. doi: 10.18332/tid/172140. eCollection 2023.
3
5
Smoking Cessation System for Preemptive Smoking Detection.
IEEE Internet Things J. 2022 Mar;9(5):3204-3214. doi: 10.1109/jiot.2021.3097728. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
6
Securing Smokefree Laws Covering Casinos and Bars in Louisiana via Messaging, Continuous Campaigning and Health Coalitions.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 25;19(7):3936. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073936.
7
Tobacco industry thwarts ad ban legislation in India in the 1990s: Lessons for meeting FCTC obligations under Articles 13 and 5.3.
Addict Behav. 2022 Jul;130:107306. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107306. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
9
Exposing current tobacco industry lobbying, contributions, meals, and gifts.
Tob Induc Dis. 2022 Jan 21;20:03. doi: 10.18332/tid/144765. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Tobacco industry allegations of "illegal lobbying" and state tobacco control.
Am J Public Health. 2001 Jan;91(1):62-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.1.62.
3
Failure to defend a successful state tobacco control program: policy lessons from Florida.
Am J Public Health. 2000 May;90(5):762-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.5.762.
4
Tobacco industry efforts subverting International Agency for Research on Cancer's second-hand smoke study.
Lancet. 2000 Apr 8;355(9211):1253-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02098-5.
5
The campaign to enact New York City's Smoke-Free Air Act.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):1-13. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199901000-00003.
6
The potential for using excise taxes to reduce smoking.
J Health Econ. 1982 Aug;1(2):121-45. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(82)90011-x.
7
Reactions of adult and teenaged smokers to the Massachusetts tobacco tax.
Am J Public Health. 1998 Sep;88(9):1389-91. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.9.1389.
8
Are tobacco industry campaign contributions influencing state legislative behavior?
Am J Public Health. 1998 Jun;88(6):918-23. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.6.918.
9
The defeat of Philip Morris' 'California Uniform Tobacco Control Act'.
Am J Public Health. 1997 Dec;87(12):1989-96. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.12.1989.
10
The relationship of cigarette prices and no-smoking bylaws to the prevalence of smoking in Canada.
Am J Public Health. 1997 Sep;87(9):1519-21. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.9.1519.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验