德卢斯清洁室内空气条例：21世纪在地方层面与烟草业作斗争中的问题与成效
The Duluth clean indoor air ordinance: problems and success in fighting the tobacco industry at the local level in the 21st century.
作者信息
Tsoukalas Theodore, Glantz Stanton A
机构信息
Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco 94143-1390, USA.
出版信息
Am J Public Health. 2003 Aug;93(8):1214-21. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.8.1214.
Abstract
Case study methodology was used to investigate the tobacco industry's strategies to fight local tobacco control efforts in Duluth, Minn. The industry opposed the clean indoor air ordinance indirectly through allies and front groups and directly in a referendum. Health groups failed to win a strong ordinance because they framed it as a youth issue rather than a workplace issue and failed to engage the industry's economic claims. Opponents' overexploitation of weaknesses in the ordinance allowed health advocates to construct a stronger version. Health advocates should assume that the tobacco industry will oppose all local tobacco control measures indirectly, directly, or both. Clean indoor air ordinances should be framed as workplace safety issues.
摘要
采用案例研究方法，调查烟草行业在明尼苏达州德卢斯应对当地烟草控制措施的策略。该行业通过盟友和前沿组织间接反对清洁室内空气条例，并在公投中直接反对。健康组织未能赢得一项强有力的条例，因为他们将其框定为青少年问题而非工作场所问题，并且未能应对该行业的经济主张。反对者对条例弱点的过度利用使健康倡导者能够制定出更强有力的版本。健康倡导者应假定烟草行业将间接、直接或同时反对所有地方烟草控制措施。清洁室内空气条例应被框定为工作场所安全问题。
相似文献
1
The Duluth clean indoor air ordinance: problems and success in fighting the tobacco industry at the local level in the 21st century.德卢斯清洁室内空气条例：21世纪在地方层面与烟草业作斗争中的问题与成效
Am J Public Health. 2003 Aug;93(8):1214-21. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.8.1214.
2
Boards of Health as venues for clean indoor air policy making.作为制定室内空气清洁政策场所的卫生局。
Am J Public Health. 2002 Feb;92(2):257-65. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.2.257.
3
Communicating with local elected officials: lessons learned from clean indoor air ordinance campaigns.与当地民选官员沟通：从清洁室内空气条例运动中汲取的经验教训。
Health Promot Pract. 2010 Mar;11(2):275-81. doi: 10.1177/1524839908324781. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
4
Effects of clean indoor air laws on bar and restaurant revenue in Minnesota cities.明尼苏达州各城市实施室内禁烟令对酒吧和餐馆收入的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Dec;39(6 Suppl 1):S10-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.011.
5
Lessons learned on the road to a smoke-free Italy.无烟意大利之路的经验教训。
Ann Ig. 2011 Mar-Apr;23(2):125-36.
6
Tobacco control and direct democracy in Dade County, Florida: future implications for health advocates.佛罗里达州戴德县的烟草控制与直接民主：对健康倡导者的未来影响
J Public Health Policy. 2000;21(3):268-95.
7
Employment change for bars and restaurants following a statewide clean indoor air policy.全州范围内实行室内空气清洁政策后，酒吧和餐馆的就业变化。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Dec;39(6 Suppl 1):S16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.08.015.
8
The new battleground: California's experience with smoke-free bars.新的战场：加利福尼亚州无烟酒吧的经历。
Am J Public Health. 2001 Feb;91(2):245-52. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.2.245.
9
Effectiveness of clean indoor air ordinances in controlling environmental tobacco smoke in restaurants.室内空气清洁条例在控制餐厅内环境烟草烟雾方面的有效性。
Arch Environ Health. 2004 Dec;59(12):677-85. doi: 10.1080/00039890409602953.
10
Tobacco control advocacy in Australia: reflections on 30 years of progress.澳大利亚的烟草控制倡导：对30年进展的反思
Health Educ Behav. 2001 Jun;28(3):274-89. doi: 10.1177/109019810102800303.
引用本文的文献
1
Advocacy counterstrategies to tobacco industry interference in policymaking: a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature.倡导应对烟草业干预决策制定的反策略：同行评议文献的范围综述。
Global Health. 2023 Jun 21;19(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00936-7.
2
Strategies for knowledge exchange for action to address place-based determinants of health inequalities: an umbrella review.针对健康不平等的基于场所决定因素的行动的知识交流策略：伞式综述。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Aug 28;45(3):e467-e477. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdac146.
3
Securing Smokefree Laws Covering Casinos and Bars in Louisiana via Messaging, Continuous Campaigning and Health Coalitions.通过信息传递、持续宣传和健康联盟，确保路易斯安那州的赌场和酒吧禁烟法律得到实施。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 25;19(7):3936. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073936.
4
Needs of LMIC-based tobacco control advocates to counter tobacco industry policy interference: insights from semi-structured interviews.中低收入国家烟草控制倡导者应对烟草业政策干扰的需求：来自半结构化访谈的见解。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 26;10(11):e044710. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044710.
5
Smokefree implementation in Colombia: Monitoring, outside funding, and business support.哥伦比亚无烟政策的实施：监测、外部资金与商业支持。
Salud Publica Mex. 2017 Mar-Apr;59(2):128-136. doi: 10.21149/7884.
6
E-cigarette Policymaking by Local and State Governments: 2009-2014.地方和州政府的电子烟政策制定：2009 - 2014年
Milbank Q. 2016 Sep;94(3):520-96. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12212.
7
Assessment of the smoke-free outdoor regulation in the WHO European Region.对世界卫生组织欧洲区域无烟户外规定的评估。
Prev Med. 2014 Jul;64:37-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.03.020. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
8
The pattern of indoor smoking restriction law transitions, 1970-2009: laws are sticky.1970-2009 年室内吸烟限制法律的转变模式：法律具有粘性。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Aug;103(8):e44-51. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301449. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
9
Newspaper coverage of implementation of the Michigan smoke-free law: lessons learned.报纸对密歇根州无烟法律实施情况的报道：经验教训
Health Promot Pract. 2013 Nov;14(6):901-8. doi: 10.1177/1524839913476300. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
10
Moving from intersection to integration: public health law research and public health systems and services research.从交叉走向融合：公共卫生法研究与公共卫生系统和服务研究。
Milbank Q. 2012 Jun;90(2):375-408. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00667.x.
本文引用的文献
1
Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review.无烟工作场所对吸烟行为的影响：系统评价
BMJ. 2002 Jul 27;325(7357):188. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7357.188.
2
Tobacco industry manipulation of the hospitality industry to maintain smoking in public places.烟草行业对酒店业的操纵，以维持公共场所吸烟现象。
Tob Control. 2002 Jun;11(2):94-104. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.2.94.
3
Strange bedfellows: the history of collaboration between the Massachusetts Restaurant Association and the tobacco industry.奇怪的伙伴：马萨诸塞州餐馆协会与烟草行业的合作史。
Am J Public Health. 2001 Apr;91(4):598-603. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.4.598.
4
The new battleground: California's experience with smoke-free bars.新的战场：加利福尼亚州无烟酒吧的经历。
Am J Public Health. 2001 Feb;91(2):245-52. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.2.245.
5
The implementation and enforcement of tobacco control laws: policy implications for activists and the industry.烟草控制法律的实施与执行：对活动人士和烟草行业的政策影响
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1999 Jun;24(3):567-98. doi: 10.1215/03616878-24-3-567.
6
Tourism and hotel revenues before and after passage of smoke-free restaurant ordinances.无烟餐厅条例通过前后的旅游和酒店收入。
JAMA. 1999 May 26;281(20):1911-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.20.1911.
7
Restaurant employment before and after the New York City Smoke-Free Air Act.纽约市无烟空气法案前后的餐厅就业情况。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):22-7. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199901000-00005.
8
Analysis of taxable sales receipts: was New York City's Smoke-Free Air Act bad for restaurant business?应税销售收据分析：纽约市的无烟空气法案对餐饮业不利吗？
J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):14-21. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199901000-00004.
9
Smoke-free restaurant ordinances do not affect restaurant business. Period.无烟餐厅条例不会影响餐厅生意。就是这样。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):vi-ix. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199901000-00002.
10
The effect of ordinances requiring smoke-free restaurants and bars on revenues: a follow-up.要求餐厅和酒吧禁烟的条例对收入的影响：一项后续研究。
Am J Public Health. 1997 Oct;87(10):1687-93. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.10.1687.
Zotero 插件