Mayr A
Zentralbl Bakteriol B. 1979 Mar;168(2):109-33.
The danger to which man is exposed as a result of viruses contained in food differs basically from the risk to man caused by bacteria, fungi or their toxins. With respect to viral injuries it is not the specific diseases (e.g. hepatitis and polio) that are in the foreground but the much more dangerous noxious groups whose cause/effect relationships are rather complex. 1. the oncogenic risk, 2. synergistic interactions with opportunistic problem viruses, 3. slowly developing chronic diseases and persistent infections with their indirect injuries, 4. new infectious pathogens (viroids). Viral contamination of food can be exogenous or endogenous. Exogenous contamination is possible by: 1. specific human-pathogenic viruses, 2. polyphagous, human-pathogenic and animal-pathogenic viruses (zoonosis), 3. animal-pathogenic viruses only, 4. fish viruses, 6. bacteriophages, 7. fungal viruses. The viruses of group 1 and 2 are of practical importance, those of group 6 and 7 are it occasionally. Endogenous contamination is caused when an animal suffered from a viral infection at the time of slaughter or product extraction (e.g. milk, egg, fish) or when the animal has picked up a virus shortly beforhand. As far as endogenous contamination is concerned, a distinction must be made between 1. primarily biological and 2. primarily mechanical contamination. For the first, mainly the clinically inapparent especially persistent infections and viraemic stages at the end of incubation are dangerous. In both cases the animal is clinically healthy. In primarily biological contamination the zoonosis viruses predominate. In addition the bacteriophages must be taken into account. Primarily mechanical contamination is restricted to fish, molluscs, milk and eggs. The possibilities and consequences of exogenous and endogenous contamination are discussed. The risk of viral transmission by foodstuffs depends chiefly on the tenacity of the virus in the affected food, but also on its virulence and concentration. Basic considerations are discussed. Practically from any useful, healthy animal the most varied viruses can be isolated. In order to avoid destroying the confidence of the consumer, it is necessary to take stock of the following: 1. viral contamination in foodstuffs demonstrated so far 2. verified human diseases caused by the intake of virus-contaminated foodstuff and 3. speculations on imaginable consequential damage caused by the consumption of food containing virus. This is also dealt with in the paper. In a final, critical review the importance of virus contained in food is discussed comprehensively from a scientific, legal and practical point of view.
人类因食物中所含病毒而面临的危险与由细菌、真菌或其毒素给人类造成的风险有着根本区别。就病毒感染而言,处于首要地位的并非特定疾病(如肝炎和小儿麻痹症),而是那些更为危险的有害类别,其因果关系相当复杂。1. 致癌风险;2. 与机会性问题病毒的协同相互作用;3. 缓慢发展的慢性病以及伴随间接损伤的持续性感染;4. 新的传染性病原体(类病毒)。食物的病毒污染可能是外源性的,也可能是内源性的。外源性污染可能通过以下途径发生:1. 特定的人类致病性病毒;2. 兼性、人类致病性和动物致病性病毒(人畜共患病);3. 仅动物致病性病毒;4. 鱼类病毒;6. 噬菌体;7. 真菌病毒。第1组和第2组病毒具有实际重要性,第6组和第7组病毒偶尔具有重要性。内源性污染是在动物屠宰或产品提取(如牛奶、鸡蛋、鱼类)时患有病毒感染,或者动物在不久前感染了病毒时造成的。就内源性污染而言,必须区分1. 主要是生物性污染和2. 主要是机械性污染。对于前者,主要是临床上不明显的尤其是持续性感染以及潜伏期结束时的病毒血症阶段具有危险性。在这两种情况下,动物在临床上都是健康的。在主要是生物性污染中,人畜共患病病毒占主导。此外,还必须考虑噬菌体。主要是机械性污染仅限于鱼类、软体动物、牛奶和鸡蛋。本文讨论了外源性和内源性污染的可能性及后果。通过食品传播病毒的风险主要取决于病毒在受影响食物中的存活能力,但也取决于其毒力和浓度。文中讨论了一些基本考量因素。实际上,从任何有用的健康动物身上都能分离出各种各样的病毒。为了避免破坏消费者的信心,有必要梳理以下内容:1. 迄今为止在食品中证实的病毒污染;2. 因摄入受病毒污染的食品而导致的已证实的人类疾病;3. 关于食用含病毒食物可能造成的可想象的间接损害的推测。本文也涉及了这方面内容。在最后的批判性综述中,从科学、法律和实际角度全面讨论了食物中所含病毒的重要性。