Redmond C A, Blinkhorn F A, Kay E J, Davies R M, Worthington H V, Blinkhorn A S
Trafford Health Care NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
J Public Health Dent. 1999 Winter;59(1):12-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1999.tb03229.x.
This trial investigated the value of a school-based dental health education program in terms of changes in knowledge, reported behavior, and plaque scores.
A total of 2,678 pupils with a mean age of 12.1 years attending 28 schools participated in a school-based dental health education program. The study used a cluster randomized controlled study design. The health service administrators stipulated that all participants receive the intervention; to meet this requirement, a rolling program of two six-month periods was utilized. During the first six months, half the adolescents received the intervention program, the other half acting as controls. Throughout a further six-month period, all participants received the intervention program. This research design allowed comparisons between participants receiving the program for six and 12 months. At baseline, six, and 12 months, a random subsample of 40 children in each participating school had their plaque scores recorded and a questionnaire was used to record their knowledge of dental health and reported dental behavior.
The analysis used the subjects clustered within the schools, which were the units of randomization. The intervention program produced statistically significant improvements (P < .001) in knowledge about periodontal disease and the frequency of sugar intake and dental caries in both assessment time periods. The reported frequency of brushing did not change, but the group who had received 12 months of the intervention were more likely (P < .05) to brush for over a minute. At six months the early intervention group had a statistically significant, 13 percent reduction in the mean proportion of sites with plaque compared with the late intervention group (P = .043). This difference was sustained at 12 months (P = .037).
This cluster randomized control trial demonstrated that the intervention program resulted in an improvement in knowledge of dental disease and an increase in the reported duration of brushing. These improvements were accompanied by a significant improvement in oral hygiene and a reported reduction in gingival bleeding.
本试验从知识、报告行为和菌斑评分变化方面研究了一项以学校为基础的口腔健康教育项目的价值。
共有28所学校的2678名平均年龄为12.1岁的学生参与了一项以学校为基础的口腔健康教育项目。该研究采用整群随机对照研究设计。卫生服务管理人员规定所有参与者都要接受干预;为满足这一要求,采用了一个为期两个六个月的滚动项目。在前六个月中,一半青少年接受干预项目,另一半作为对照组。在接下来的六个月中,所有参与者都接受干预项目。这种研究设计允许对接受项目6个月和12个月的参与者进行比较。在基线、6个月和12个月时,对每所参与学校的40名儿童进行随机抽样,记录他们的菌斑评分,并使用问卷记录他们的口腔健康知识和报告的口腔行为。
分析使用了学校内聚类的受试者,学校是随机化单位。干预项目在两个评估时间段内对牙周病知识、糖摄入频率和龋齿方面产生了具有统计学意义的改善(P < .001)。报告的刷牙频率没有变化,但接受了12个月干预的组更有可能(P < .05)刷牙超过一分钟。在6个月时,与后期干预组相比,早期干预组菌斑部位的平均比例有统计学意义地降低了13%(P = .043)。这种差异在12个月时仍然存在(P = .037)。
这项整群随机对照试验表明,干预项目导致了口腔疾病知识的改善和报告的刷牙时间增加。这些改善伴随着口腔卫生的显著改善和报告的牙龈出血减少。