Ikedo Y
Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume 830-0011, Japan.
Kurume Med J. 2001;48(1):15-9. doi: 10.2739/kurumemedj.48.15.
To investigate the usefulness of bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) pulmonary disease, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical charts, and radiographic and bacteriologic findings of all patients who were admitted to our hospital between 1994 and 2000, and who fulfilled the 1997 American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria for MAC pulmonary infection. A total of 132 patients were diagnosed as affected by MAC pulmonary disease during that period. Of these, bronchoscopic examination was performed in those patients who showed negative sputum smear for mycobacteria on three consecutive days (n = 43) or who could not expectorate sputum (n = 2). Of 42 patients, sputum culture was positive for MAC in 34 patients (81.0%). Bronchial washing sample was smear-positive for MAC in 17 of 39 patients (43.6%), and culture-positive for MAC in 33 of the 39 patients (84.6%). Transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) specimens revealed specific findings (epithelioid cell granuloma and/or acid-fast bacilli) in 14 of 38 patients (36.9%). Bronchial washing of all patients who showed specific histology in TBLB grew MAC in culture. Based on the bronchoscopic examination, we could diagnose MAC pulmonary disease in 36 patients. In addition, smear and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results of bronchial washing made possible an early diagnosis of MAC pulmonary disease in 15 patients. We examined the relation of CT findings to bronchial washing results. Isolation of MAC in bronchial washing is significantly related to small nodular opacity around the ectatic bronchi on the CT scan (p = 0.016). In our retrospective study, in sputum smear-negative patients with MAC pulmonary disease, MAC isolation by culture of bronchial washing was no more frequent than that with sputum culture. However, bronchial washing is useful to differentiate infection from casual isolation of MAC. In addition, we could make early diagnosis of MAC pulmonary disease based on smear and PCR results of bronchial washing. To make a diagnosis of MAC, bronchial washing is superior to TBLB, and should be done in the bronchus which drains the area revealing small nodular opacity around ectatic bronchi.
为了研究支气管镜检查在鸟分枝杆菌复合群(MAC)肺病诊断中的作用,我们回顾性分析了1994年至2000年间我院收治的、符合1997年美国胸科学会(ATS)MAC肺部感染标准的所有患者的临床病历、影像学及细菌学检查结果。在此期间,共有132例患者被诊断为MAC肺病。其中,对连续3天痰涂片抗酸杆菌阴性的患者(n = 43)或无法咳痰的患者(n = 2)进行了支气管镜检查。在42例患者中,34例(81.0%)痰培养MAC阳性。39例患者中,17例(43.6%)支气管灌洗样本涂片MAC阳性,33例(84.6%)培养MAC阳性。38例患者中,14例(36.9%)经支气管肺活检(TBLB)标本有特异性表现(上皮样细胞肉芽肿和/或抗酸杆菌)。所有TBLB有特异性组织学表现的患者支气管灌洗培养均生长出MAC。基于支气管镜检查,我们确诊了36例MAC肺病患者。此外,支气管灌洗的涂片和聚合酶链反应(PCR)结果使15例患者得以早期诊断MAC肺病。我们研究了CT表现与支气管灌洗结果的关系。支气管灌洗中分离出MAC与CT扫描显示扩张支气管周围小结节状阴影显著相关(p = 0.016)。在我们的回顾性研究中,MAC肺病痰涂片阴性患者中,支气管灌洗培养分离出MAC的频率并不高于痰培养。然而,支气管灌洗有助于区分MAC感染与偶然分离。此外,基于支气管灌洗的涂片和PCR结果,我们能够对MAC肺病进行早期诊断。为诊断MAC,支气管灌洗优于TBLB,应在引流显示扩张支气管周围小结节状阴影区域的支气管进行。