Maekawa Koichi, Naka Megumi, Shuto Saki, Harada Yuka, Ikegami Yumiko
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Japan.
J Infect Chemother. 2017 Sep;23(9):604-608. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
The utility of bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of pulmonary Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex (MAC) disease has been reported; however, which patients require bronchoscopy remains unclear. Our objective was to identify the characteristics of the patients in whom bronchoscopy is needed for the diagnosis of MAC disease.
Fifty-four patients with pulmonary MAC disease were divided into two groups according to established diagnostic criteria: 39 patients were diagnosed by sputum culture and 15 patients were diagnosed by bronchial lavage culture. We analysed the differences in demographic and clinical characteristics as well as microbiological and radiological data between the two groups.
There were no significant differences in age, sex, smoking status, MAC species, underlying diseases, or steroid use. Significantly more patients diagnosed by sputum culture than bronchial lavage culture had a positive sputum smear for acid-fast bacilli (79.5% vs. 0.0%, respectively; p < 0.001) and any symptoms (75.3% vs. 46.2%, respectively; p = 0.0059). No significant differences were found in the prevalence of each computed tomography finding, including nodules, air-space disease, bronchiectasis, and cavities. However, more patients diagnosed by sputum culture than bronchial lavage culture had abnormalities in the left upper division (48.7% vs. 13.3%, respectively; p = 0.017) and higher numbers of affected lobes (4.3 ± 1.4 vs. 3.3 ± 1.6, respectively; p = 0.034).
If patients suspected of having pulmonary MAC disease have a negative sputum smear, no symptoms, no abnormal findings in the left upper division, or fewer affected lobes on computed tomography, bronchoscopy might be needed for the diagnosis.
支气管镜检查在诊断肺部鸟分枝杆菌复合群(MAC)病中的应用已有报道;然而,哪些患者需要进行支气管镜检查仍不清楚。我们的目的是确定诊断MAC病需要进行支气管镜检查的患者特征。
根据既定诊断标准,将54例肺部MAC病患者分为两组:39例通过痰培养确诊,15例通过支气管灌洗培养确诊。我们分析了两组在人口统计学和临床特征以及微生物学和放射学数据方面的差异。
两组在年龄、性别、吸烟状况、MAC菌种、基础疾病或类固醇使用方面无显著差异。痰培养确诊的患者中,痰涂片抗酸杆菌阳性(分别为79.5%和0.0%;p<0.001)以及有任何症状(分别为75.3%和46.2%;p=0.0059)的患者显著多于支气管灌洗培养确诊的患者。在包括结节、气腔病变、支气管扩张和空洞等各计算机断层扫描结果的患病率方面未发现显著差异。然而,痰培养确诊的患者中,左上叶异常(分别为48.7%和13.3%;p=0.017)以及受累肺叶数量较多(分别为4.3±1.4和3.3±1.6;p=0.034)的患者多于支气管灌洗培养确诊的患者。
如果怀疑患有肺部MAC病的患者痰涂片阴性、无症状、左上叶无异常发现或计算机断层扫描显示受累肺叶较少,则可能需要进行支气管镜检查以明确诊断。