Suppr超能文献

自我控制与合作:概念不同,决策相似?视角恰当与否的问题。

Self-control and cooperation: different concepts, similar decisions? A question of the right perspective.

作者信息

Dewitte S, De Cremer D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

J Psychol. 2001 Mar;135(2):133-53. doi: 10.1080/00223980109603686.

Abstract

Conflicts between an individual's long-term and short-term goals (i.e., self-control conflicts) and conflicts between individual and collective interests (mixed-motive situations) share some interesting features. In this article both types of conflicts are approached from a perspective hypothesis. The hypothesis holds that a decision maker's perspective on his or her decision determines whether either the long-term goals (the collective interests) or the short-term goals (the individual interests) will guide behavior. The hypothesis also implies that factors known to enhance cooperative choices in mixed-motive situations should also facilitate self-control. Three such factors are evaluated: group identification, self-efficacy, and mutual trust. We conclude that the perspective in which choice is considered part of an identifiable series of behaviors is most likely to result in cooperation or self-control.

摘要

个人长期目标与短期目标之间的冲突(即自我控制冲突)以及个人利益与集体利益之间的冲突(混合动机情境)具有一些有趣的特征。在本文中,这两种冲突都是从一个视角假设的角度来探讨的。该假设认为,决策者对其决策的视角决定了长期目标(集体利益)还是短期目标(个人利益)将引导行为。该假设还意味着,已知在混合动机情境中增强合作选择的因素也应促进自我控制。本文评估了三个这样的因素:群体认同、自我效能感和相互信任。我们得出结论,将选择视为一系列可识别行为一部分的视角最有可能导致合作或自我控制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验