Sheikh A, Hurwitz B
Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, Imperial College School of Medicine, St Dunstan's Road, London W6 8RP.
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Jun;51(467):473-7.
There has been uncertainty about whether antibiotic therapy confers significant benefit in the treatment of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of antibiotic therapy in the management of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. Using standard Cochrane search methods, we identified double-blind randomised controlled trials in which any form of antibiotic treatment (topical, systemic or combination) had been compared with placebo in the management of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. Data extraction and analysis followed a pre-defined protocol. Meta-analysis was performed to obtain summary measures of relative risk. Six published trials were identified, of which three fulfilled the eligibility criteria for inclusion in this review. The trials were heterogeneous in terms of their inclusion and exclusion criteria, the nature of the intervention, and the outcome measures assessed. Meta-analysis indicates that acute bacterial conjunctivitis is frequently a self-limiting condition, as clinical remission occurred by days 2 to 5 in 64% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 57-71) of those treated with placebo. Treatment with antibiotics was, however, associated with significantly better rates of clinical remission (days 2 to 5: relative risk (RR) = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.11-1.55), with a suggestion that this benefit was maintained for late clinical remission (days 6 to 10: RR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.00-1.61). Acute bacterial conjunctivitis is frequently a self-limiting condition but the use of antibiotics is associated with significantly improved rates of early clinical remission, and early and late microbiological remission. Since trials to date have been conducted in selected specialist care patient populations, generalisation of these results to a primary care-based population should be undertaken with a degree of caution.
抗生素疗法在治疗急性细菌性结膜炎时是否能带来显著益处一直存在不确定性。本研究旨在评估抗生素疗法在急性细菌性结膜炎治疗中的疗效。我们采用标准的Cochrane检索方法,确定了双盲随机对照试验,这些试验将任何形式的抗生素治疗(局部、全身或联合使用)与安慰剂在急性细菌性结膜炎治疗中进行了比较。数据提取和分析遵循预先定义的方案。进行荟萃分析以获得相对风险的汇总指标。共识别出6项已发表的试验,其中3项符合纳入本综述的资格标准。这些试验在纳入和排除标准、干预措施的性质以及评估的结局指标方面存在异质性。荟萃分析表明,急性细菌性结膜炎通常是一种自限性疾病,因为在接受安慰剂治疗的患者中,64%(95%置信区间(CI)=57 - 71)在第2至5天出现临床缓解。然而,使用抗生素治疗与显著更高的临床缓解率相关(第2至5天:相对风险(RR)=1.31,95%CI =1.11 - 1.55),且有迹象表明这种益处持续到后期临床缓解(第6至10天:RR =1.27,95%CI =1.00 - 1.61)。急性细菌性结膜炎通常是自限性疾病,但使用抗生素与早期临床缓解率以及早期和晚期微生物学缓解率的显著提高相关。由于迄今为止的试验是在选定的专科护理患者群体中进行的,因此将这些结果推广到以初级保健为基础的人群时应谨慎。