Thapar A, McDermott K B
Department of Psychology, Bryn Mawr College, Pennsylvania 19010, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2001 Apr;29(3):424-32. doi: 10.3758/bf03196393.
The effects of retention interval and level of processing on false recall and false recognition of associates were examined. False recall and false recognition were induced by presenting subjects with words closely associated with a non-studied word. Both level of processing and retention interval affected false recall (Experiment 1) and false recognition (Experiment 2) in the same direction with which they affected accurate recall and accurate recognition. That is, semantically processed lists exhibited higher levels of later false recall and false recognition than did superficially processed lists. Furthermore, a decline in false recall and false recognition occurred across retention intervals of 0, 2, and 7 days. However, the decline in false recall and false recognition was less pronounced than the decline in accurate recall and accurate recognition. Results are consistent with source monitoring and fuzzy trace explanations of false recall and false recognition.
研究了保持间隔和加工水平对联想词的错误回忆和错误识别的影响。通过向受试者呈现与未学习单词密切相关的单词来诱发错误回忆和错误识别。加工水平和保持间隔对错误回忆(实验1)和错误识别(实验2)的影响方向与它们对准确回忆和准确识别的影响方向相同。也就是说,语义加工的列表比表面加工的列表表现出更高水平的后期错误回忆和错误识别。此外,在0天、2天和7天的保持间隔中,错误回忆和错误识别都出现了下降。然而,错误回忆和错误识别的下降不如准确回忆和准确识别的下降明显。结果与错误回忆和错误识别的源监测和模糊痕迹解释一致。