Suppr超能文献

牧场径流的细菌学质量

Bacteriological quality of runoff water from pastureland.

作者信息

Doran J W, Linn D M

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 May;37(5):985-91. doi: 10.1128/aem.37.5.985-991.1979.

Abstract

Runoff from a cow-calf pasture in eastern Nebraska was monitored for total coliforms (TC), fecal coliforms (FC), and fecal streptococci (FS) during 1976, 1977, and 1978. Bacteriological counts in runoff from both grazed and ungrazed areas generally exceeded recommended water quality standards. The FC group was the best indicator group of the impact of grazing. Rainfall runoff from the grazed area contained 5 to 10 times more FC than runoff from the fenced, ungrazed area. There was little difference in TC counts between the two areas, but FS counts were higher in runoff from the ungrazed area and reflected the contributions from wildlife. Recommended bacteriological water quality standards, developed for point source inputs, may be inappropriate for characterizing nonpoint source pollution from pasture runoff. The FC/FS ratio in pasture runoff was useful in identifying the relative contributions of cattle and wildlife. Ratios below 0.05 were indicative of wildlife sources and ratios above 0.1 were characteristic of grazing cattle. Occasions when the FC/FS ratio of diluted cattle waste exceeded one resulted from differential aftergrowth and die-off between FC and FS. The FC/FS ratio and percentage of Streptococcus bovis in pasture runoff are useful indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of livestock management practices for minimizing bacterial contamination of surface water. The importance of choice of medium for the enumeration of FS in runoff derived from cattle wastes is discussed.

摘要

1976年、1977年和1978年期间,对美国内布拉斯加州东部一个肉牛繁殖牧场的径流进行了总大肠菌群(TC)、粪大肠菌群(FC)和粪链球菌(FS)监测。放牧区和未放牧区径流中的细菌学计数普遍超过了推荐的水质标准。粪大肠菌群组是放牧影响的最佳指示菌群。放牧区的降雨径流中粪大肠菌群含量比围栏未放牧区的径流高5至10倍。两个区域的总大肠菌群计数差异不大,但未放牧区径流中的粪链球菌计数较高,反映了野生动物的影响。为点源输入制定的推荐细菌学水质标准可能不适用于表征牧场径流的非点源污染。牧场径流中的粪大肠菌群/粪链球菌比率有助于确定牛和野生动物的相对影响。该比率低于0.05表明是野生动物来源,高于0.1则是放牧牛的特征。稀释后的牛粪中粪大肠菌群/粪链球菌比率超过1的情况是由于粪大肠菌群和粪链球菌在生长和死亡后的差异所致。牧场径流中的粪大肠菌群/粪链球菌比率和牛链球菌百分比是评估畜牧管理措施对减少地表水细菌污染有效性的有用指标。本文还讨论了选择培养基对源自牛粪的径流中粪链球菌计数的重要性。

相似文献

1
Bacteriological quality of runoff water from pastureland.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 May;37(5):985-91. doi: 10.1128/aem.37.5.985-991.1979.
3
Fecal indicator bacteria persistence under natural conditions in an ice-covered river.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Oct;32(4):527-36. doi: 10.1128/aem.32.4.527-536.1976.
4
Effects of cattle manure on erosion rates and runoff water pollution by faecal coliforms.
J Environ Manage. 2006 Jan;78(1):97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.010. Epub 2005 Aug 18.
5
Farmyards, an overlooked source for highly contaminated runoff.
J Environ Manage. 2008 Jun;87(4):551-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.06.027. Epub 2008 Jan 7.
6
Escherichia coli runoff from sheep and dairy cow grazed pasture: A plot scale simulation.
J Environ Qual. 2023 Mar;52(2):287-295. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20448. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
7
Mapping of critical source areas for diffuse fecal bacterial pollution in extensively grazed watersheds.
Water Res. 2010 Jul;44(13):3847-60. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.04.039. Epub 2010 May 6.
8
Demonstration of methods to reduce E. coli runoff from dairy manure application sites.
J Environ Qual. 2006 May 31;35(4):1088-100. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0380. Print 2006 Jul-Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
Pathogens in livestock waste, their potential for movement through soil and environmental pollution.
Appl Soil Ecol. 1995 Mar;2(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/0929-1393(94)00039-A. Epub 2000 Jan 19.
4
Escherichia coli survival in, and release from, white-tailed deer feces.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Feb;81(3):1168-76. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03295-14. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
5
Evaluation of land use and water quality in an agricultural watershed in the USA indicates multiple sources of bacterial impairment.
Environ Monit Assess. 2013 Dec;185(12):10395-420. doi: 10.1007/s10661-013-3340-y. Epub 2013 Jul 20.
6
Bacteriological quality of abattoir effluents discharged into water bodies in abuja, Nigeria.
ISRN Vet Sci. 2012 Jul 19;2012:515689. doi: 10.5402/2012/515689. Print 2012.
7
Assessing chronological aging in bacteria.
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;965:421-37. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-239-1_28.
8
Enterococci in the environment.
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012 Dec;76(4):685-706. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00023-12.
10
Genotypic diversity of Escherichia coli in the water and soil of tropical watersheds in Hawaii.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Jun;77(12):3988-97. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02140-10. Epub 2011 Apr 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Studies in the differentiation between human and animal pollution by means of faecal streptococci.
J Gen Microbiol. 1955 Apr;12(2):180-90. doi: 10.1099/00221287-12-2-180.
2
DETECTION AND SANITARY SIGNIFICANCE OF FECAL STREPTOCOCCI IN WATER.
Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1964 Apr;54(4):609-14. doi: 10.2105/ajph.54.4.609.
3
Rural runoff as a factor in stream pollution.
J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1969 Mar;41(3):377-84.
4
Stream pollution from animal production units.
J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1972 Aug;44(8):1536-44.
5
Comparison of selective media for isolation of presumptive group D streptococci from human feces.
Appl Microbiol. 1971 Dec;22(6):1008-11. doi: 10.1128/am.22.6.1008-1011.1971.
6
Concepts of fecal streptococci in stream pollution.
J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1969 Aug;41(8):Suppl:R336+.
7
Comparative survival of indicator bacteria and enteric pathogens in well water.
Appl Microbiol. 1974 May;27(5):823-9. doi: 10.1128/am.27.5.823-829.1974.
8
Improved procedure for identification of group D enterococci with two new media.
Appl Microbiol. 1972 Jul;24(1):1-3. doi: 10.1128/am.24.1.1-3.1972.
9
Evaluation of selective media for enumeration of group D streptococci in bovine feces.
Appl Microbiol. 1974 Dec;28(6):1086-7. doi: 10.1128/am.28.6.1086-1087.1974.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验