Suppr超能文献

前庭疾病患者与健康对照者的姿势控制与心理任务表现之间的干扰。

Interference between postural control and mental task performance in patients with vestibular disorder and healthy controls.

作者信息

Yardley L, Gardner M, Bronstein A, Davies R, Buckwell D, Luxon L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001 Jul;71(1):48-52. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.71.1.48.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether interference between postural control and mental task performance in patients with balance system impairment and healthy subjects is due to general capacity limitations, motor control interference, competition for spatial processing resources, or a combination of these.

METHOD

Postural stability was assessed in 48 patients with vestibular disorder and 24 healthy controls while they were standing with eyes closed on (a) a stable and (b) a moving platform. Mental task performance was measured by accuracy and reaction time on mental tasks, comprising high and low load, spatial and non-spatial tasks. Interference between balancing and performing mental tasks was assessed by comparing baseline (single task) levels of sway and mental task performance with levels while concurrently balancing and carrying out mental tasks.

RESULTS

As the balancing task increased in difficulty, reaction times on both low load mental tasks grew progressively longer and accuracy on both high load tasks declined in patients and controls. Postural sway was essentially unaffected by mental activity in patients and controls.

CONCLUSIONS

It is unlikely that dual task interference between balancing and mental activity is due to competition for spatial processing resources, as levels of interference were similar in patients with vestibular disorder and healthy controls, and were also similar for spatial and non-spatial tasks. Moreover, the finding that accuracy declined on the high load tasks when balancing cannot be attributed to motor control interference, as no motor control processing is involved in maintaining accuracy of responses. Therefore, interference between mental activity and postural control can be attributed principally to general capacity limitations, and is hence proportional to the attentional demands of both tasks.

摘要

目的

确定平衡系统受损患者和健康受试者的姿势控制与心理任务表现之间的干扰是由于一般能力限制、运动控制干扰、对空间处理资源的竞争,还是这些因素的综合作用。

方法

对48名前庭疾病患者和24名健康对照者进行姿势稳定性评估,让他们闭眼站立在(a)稳定平台和(b)移动平台上。通过心理任务的准确性和反应时间来测量心理任务表现,心理任务包括高负荷和低负荷、空间和非空间任务。通过比较基线(单任务)时的摇摆水平和心理任务表现与同时进行平衡和心理任务时的水平,评估平衡与执行心理任务之间的干扰。

结果

随着平衡任务难度增加,患者和对照者在低负荷心理任务上的反应时间逐渐变长,在高负荷任务上的准确性均下降。患者和对照者的姿势摇摆基本不受心理活动影响。

结论

平衡与心理活动之间的双重任务干扰不太可能是由于对空间处理资源的竞争,因为前庭疾病患者和健康对照者的干扰水平相似,并且在空间和非空间任务中也相似。此外,平衡时高负荷任务准确性下降的发现不能归因于运动控制干扰,因为维持反应准确性不涉及运动控制处理。因此,心理活动与姿势控制之间的干扰主要可归因于一般能力限制,因此与两项任务的注意力需求成正比。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
Evidence for cognitive impairment in patients with vestibular disorders.前庭障碍患者认知障碍的证据。
J Neurol. 2022 Nov;269(11):5831-5842. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11289-3. Epub 2022 Aug 5.

本文引用的文献

2
Effect of articulatory and mental tasks on postural control.发音和心理任务对姿势控制的影响。
Neuroreport. 1999 Feb 5;10(2):215-9. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199902050-00003.
5
A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning.运动技能学习的神经心理学理论。
Psychol Rev. 1998 Jul;105(3):558-84. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.105.3.558.
9
On the cognitive penetrability of posture control.论姿势控制的认知可穿透性。
Exp Aging Res. 1993 Jan-Mar;19(1):1-13. doi: 10.1080/03610739308253919.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验