Suppr超能文献

空间最后通牒博弈

The spatial ultimatum game.

作者信息

Page K M, Nowak M A, Sigmund K

机构信息

Institute for Advanced Study, 310 Olden Lane, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Nov 7;267(1458):2177-82. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1266.

Abstract

In the ultimatum game, two players are asked to split a certain sum of money. The proposer has to make an offer. If the responder accepts the offer, the money will be shared accordingly. If the responder rejects the offer, both players receive nothing. The rational solution is for the proposer to offer the smallest possible share, and for the responder to accept it. Human players, in contrast, usually prefer fair splits. In this paper, we use evolutionary game theory to analyse the ultimatum game. We first show that in a non-spatial setting, natural selection chooses the unfair, rational solution. In a spatial setting, however, much fairer outcomes evolve.

摘要

在最后通牒博弈中,两名参与者被要求分配一定数额的金钱。提议者必须提出一个分配方案。如果回应者接受该方案,金钱将据此进行分配。如果回应者拒绝该方案,两名参与者都将一无所获。理性的解决方案是提议者给出尽可能小的份额,而回应者接受它。相比之下,人类参与者通常更喜欢公平的分配。在本文中,我们使用进化博弈论来分析最后通牒博弈。我们首先表明,在非空间环境中,自然选择会选择不公平的、理性的解决方案。然而,在空间环境中,会演化出更加公平的结果。

相似文献

1
The spatial ultimatum game.空间最后通牒博弈
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Nov 7;267(1458):2177-82. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1266.
2
Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game.最后通牒博弈中的公平与理性
Science. 2000 Sep 8;289(5485):1773-5. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5485.1773.
3
Social learning in the ultimatum game.社会学习中的最后通牒博弈。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 4;8(9):e74540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074540. eCollection 2013.
4
Empathy leads to fairness.同理心带来公平。
Bull Math Biol. 2002 Nov;64(6):1101-16. doi: 10.1006/bulm.2002.0321.

引用本文的文献

1
Fairness in the multi-proposer-multi-responder ultimatum game.多提议者-多回应者最后通牒博弈中的公平性
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 4;20(3):e0319178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319178. eCollection 2025.
5
Mathematical foundations of moral preferences.道德偏好的数学基础。
J R Soc Interface. 2021 Feb;18(175):20200880. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0880. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
6
Oscillatory dynamics in the dilemma of social distancing.社交距离困境中的振荡动力学。
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Nov;476(2243):20200686. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2020.0686. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
7
The evolution of trust and trustworthiness.信任与诚信的演变。
J R Soc Interface. 2020 Aug;17(169):20200491. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0491. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
8
Evolution of egalitarian social norm by resource management.资源管理导致平等主义社会规范的演变。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 30;15(1):e0227902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227902. eCollection 2020.
9
The evolution of lying in well-mixed populations.均匀混合群体中的说谎行为演变。
J R Soc Interface. 2019 Jul 26;16(156):20190211. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0211. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
10
Fixation properties of multiple cooperator configurations on regular graphs.正则图上多重合作者构型的固定性质
Theory Biosci. 2019 Nov;138(2):261-275. doi: 10.1007/s12064-019-00293-3. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game.最后通牒博弈中的公平与理性
Science. 2000 Sep 8;289(5485):1773-5. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5485.1773.
4
Spatial games and the maintenance of cooperation.空间博弈与合作的维持
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 May 24;91(11):4877-81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.11.4877.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验