• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童对不公平奖惩的认知。

Children's perceptions of unfair reward and punishment.

作者信息

Evans I M, Galyer K T, Smith K J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Genet Psychol. 2001 Jun;162(2):212-27. doi: 10.1080/00221320109597962.

DOI:10.1080/00221320109597962
PMID:11432606
Abstract

Being able to judge the fairness of a personal encounter and having an appreciation of the associated feelings are important components of prosocial development. This study explored a common feature of everyday experience: unfair reward and unfair punishment. Scenarios depicting 4 possible variants of unfairness were read to children aged 9 to 11 years, who then made judgments regarding the degree of unfairness and the nature and strength of the feelings experienced by the characters. Our hypothesis that children with classroom conduct problems would judge the non-receipt of a deserved reward as worse than the receipt of an undeserved punishment was not confirmed. This differentiation, however, did prove to be characteristic of boys in general, but not girls. Being asked to think of unfair things that had actually happened did not appear to influence the children's responses to hypothetical unfair situations, but did reveal that children experience and remember a variety of unfair events in everyday family contexts. This study provides evidence that children actively monitor the receipt of social reward and punishment according to their perception of fairness.

摘要

能够判断人际互动中的公平性并体会相关感受是亲社会发展的重要组成部分。本研究探讨了日常经历中的一个常见特征:不公平的奖励和不公平的惩罚。向9至11岁的儿童朗读了描绘4种可能的不公平变体的情景,然后让他们对不公平程度以及情景中人物所体验到的感受的性质和强度做出判断。我们的假设是,有课堂行为问题的儿童会认为未得到应得的奖励比得到不应得的惩罚更糟糕,但这一假设未得到证实。然而,这种差异确实被证明是一般男孩而非女孩的特征。被要求思考实际发生的不公平事件似乎并未影响儿童对假设的不公平情景的反应,但确实表明儿童在日常家庭环境中经历并记住了各种不公平事件。这项研究提供了证据,表明儿童会根据他们对公平性的认知积极监测社会奖励和惩罚的获得情况。

相似文献

1
Children's perceptions of unfair reward and punishment.儿童对不公平奖惩的认知。
J Genet Psychol. 2001 Jun;162(2):212-27. doi: 10.1080/00221320109597962.
2
Abused, neglected, and nonmaltreated children's conceptions of moral and social-conventional transgressions.受虐待、被忽视和未受虐待儿童对道德及社会习俗违规行为的认知。
Child Dev. 1984 Feb;55(1):277-87.
3
Action perception and outcome valence: effects on children's inferences of intentionality and moral and liking judgments.动作感知与结果效价:对儿童意向性推断以及道德和喜好判断的影响。
J Genet Psychol. 2001 Jun;162(2):154-66. doi: 10.1080/00221320109597957.
4
Character disposition and behavior type: influences of valence on preschool children's social judgments.性格倾向与行为类型:效价对学龄前儿童社会判断的影响
J Genet Psychol. 2009 Dec;170(4):310-25. doi: 10.1080/00221320903218349.
5
Fairness overrides group bias in children's second-party punishment.在儿童的第二方惩罚中,公平超越了群体偏见。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Apr;146(4):485-494. doi: 10.1037/xge0000244.
6
Heritability of children's prosocial behavior and differential susceptibility to parenting by variation in the dopamine receptor D4 gene.儿童亲社会行为的遗传性和多巴胺受体 D4 基因变异对父母教养的差异易感性。
Dev Psychopathol. 2011 Feb;23(1):53-67. doi: 10.1017/S0954579410000647.
7
Anger and selective attention to reward and punishment in children.儿童的愤怒情绪与对奖惩的选择性注意
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Jul;115(3):389-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.03.004.
8
Young children's evaluations of exclusion in gender-stereotypic peer contexts.幼儿对性别刻板印象同伴情境中排斥行为的评价。
Dev Psychol. 2001 Jan;37(1):18-27.
9
Young children's knowledge about the influence of thoughts on emotions in rule situations.幼儿对规则情境中思想对情绪影响的认知。
Dev Sci. 2008 Nov;11(6):809-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00727.x.
10
Why do children punish? Fair outcomes matter more than intent in children's second- and third-party punishment.儿童为什么要惩罚?公平的结果比儿童的第二方和第三方惩罚中的意图更重要。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Dec;200:104909. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104909. Epub 2020 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
No one is going to recess: How children evaluate collective and targeted punishment.没人能去课间休息:儿童如何评估集体惩罚和针对性惩罚。
Soc Dev. 2024 May;33(2). doi: 10.1111/sode.12730. Epub 2024 Jan 4.