• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺癌根治术前3个月与8个月新辅助激素治疗的随机对照研究:生化和病理效应

Randomized comparative study of 3 versus 8-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy: biochemical and pathological effects.

作者信息

Gleave M E, Goldenberg S L, Chin J L, Warner J, Saad F, Klotz L H, Jewett M, Kassabian V, Chetner M, Dupont C, Van Rensselaer S

机构信息

Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

J Urol. 2001 Aug;166(2):500-6; discussion 506-7.

PMID:11458055
Abstract

PURPOSE

A prospective phase 3 trial was initiated to determine whether 8 compared with 3-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy reduces prostate specific antigen (PSA) recurrence rates after radical prostatectomy. Our interim analysis includes secondary end points of differences in biochemistry, pathology and adverse events between the 2 groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Men with clinically confined prostate cancer were randomized to receive 7.5 mg. leuprolide intramuscularly monthly and 250 mg. flutamide orally 3 times daily for 3 or 8 months before radical prostatectomy. Our study was powered to detect a 35% decrease in PSA recurrence, assuming a 30% recurrence rate in the 3-month arm after 3 years.

RESULTS

A total of 547 men were randomized between August 1995 and April 1998. Men in the 8 and 3-month groups were equally stratified for T stage (29% T1c, 70% T2), Gleason grade (68% less than 4, 32% 4 or greater) and pretreatment PSA (63% less than 10, 27% 10 to 20 and 10% greater than 20 microg./l.). Mean pretreatment PSA was slightly higher in the 8-month compared with the 3-month group (11.64 versus 9.95 microg./l., respectively, p = 0.0539). A total of 44 men withdrew from study before surgery and, therefore, were nonevaluable. Preoperative PSA nadir was less than 0.1 microg./l. in 43.3% versus 75.1% (p <0.0001), and 0.3 microg./l. or greater in 21% versus 9.2% after 3 versus 8 months, respectively (p <0.0006). Mean serum PSA decreased 98% to 0.12 microg./l. after 3 months, with a further 57% to 0.052 microg./l. from 3 to 8 months. Transrectal ultrasound determined that prostatic volume decreased 37% from a mean of 40.6 to 25.4 cc after 3-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (p = 0.0001) and a further 13% to 22.2 cc after 8 months (p = 0.03). Mean hemoglobin decreased 15% (148.2 to 125.4 gm./dl.) after 3-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy but stabilized thereafter. Radical prostatectomy was completed in 500 men, while surgery was aborted intraoperatively in 3. Positive margin rates were significantly lower in the 8 than 3-month group (12% versus 23%, respectively, p = 0.0106). There were no fatal adverse events and no differences between the 2 groups in the severity or causality (p = 0.287, 0.0564) of adverse events, or incidence of increased liver enzymes or diarrhea (p = 0.691, 0.288, respectively). However, men in the 8-month group noticed a higher number of newly reported adverse events (4.5 versus 2.9, p <0.0001) and higher incidence of hot flushes than the 3-month group (87% versus 72%, respectively, p <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Ongoing biochemical and pathological regression of prostate tumors occurs between 3 and 8 months of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, suggesting that the optimal duration of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy is longer than 3 months. Longer followup is needed to determine whether longer therapy alters PSA recurrence rates.

摘要

目的

开展一项前瞻性3期试验,以确定与3个月新辅助激素治疗相比,8个月新辅助激素治疗能否降低根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)复发率。我们的中期分析包括两组在生化、病理及不良事件方面差异的次要终点。

材料与方法

临床局限性前列腺癌男性患者在根治性前列腺切除术前行随机分组,分别接受每月7.5mg亮丙瑞林肌肉注射及每日口服250mg氟他胺3次,疗程为3个月或8个月。假设3个月疗程组在3年后复发率为30%,我们的研究旨在检测出PSA复发率降低35%。

结果

1995年8月至1998年4月间共有547名男性患者被随机分组。8个月疗程组与3个月疗程组在T分期(29%为T1c,70%为T2)、Gleason分级(68%小于4级,32%为4级或更高)及术前PSA水平(63%小于10μg/L,27%为10至20μg/L,10%大于20μg/L)方面分层均衡。8个月疗程组的平均术前PSA略高于3个月疗程组(分别为11.64μg/L和9.95μg/L,p = 0.0539)。共有44名男性患者在手术前退出研究,因此无法进行评估。术前PSA最低点小于0.1μg/L的比例在3个月疗程组为43.3%,8个月疗程组为75.1%(p <0.0001);术前PSA最低点大于或等于0.3μg/L的比例在3个月疗程组为21%,8个月疗程组为9.2%(p <0.0006)。3个月后平均血清PSA下降98%至0.12μg/L,3至8个月间进一步下降57%至0.052μg/L。经直肠超声检查显示,3个月新辅助激素治疗后前列腺体积从平均40.6cc降至25.4cc,下降37%(p = 0.0001),8个月后进一步降至22.2cc,下降13%(p = 0.03)。3个月新辅助激素治疗后平均血红蛋白下降15%(从148.2g/dl降至125.4g/dl),此后保持稳定。500名男性患者完成了根治性前列腺切除术,3名患者手术中中止。8个月疗程组的切缘阳性率显著低于3个月疗程组(分别为12%和23%,p = 0.0106)。无致命不良事件发生,两组在不良事件的严重程度或因果关系方面无差异(p = 0.287,0.0564),在肝酶升高或腹泻发生率方面也无差异(分别为p = 0.691,0.288)。然而,8个月疗程组新报告的不良事件数量更多(分别为4.5起和2.9起,p <0.0001),潮热发生率高于3个月疗程组(分别为87%和72%,p <0.0001)。

结论

新辅助激素治疗3至8个月期间前列腺肿瘤持续发生生化及病理消退,提示新辅助激素治疗的最佳疗程长于3个月。需要更长时间的随访来确定更长疗程的治疗是否会改变PSA复发率。

相似文献

1
Randomized comparative study of 3 versus 8-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy: biochemical and pathological effects.前列腺癌根治术前3个月与8个月新辅助激素治疗的随机对照研究:生化和病理效应
J Urol. 2001 Aug;166(2):500-6; discussion 506-7.
2
Biochemical and pathological effects of 8 months of neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal therapy before radical prostatectomy in patients with clinically confined prostate cancer.临床局限性前列腺癌患者在根治性前列腺切除术前行8个月新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗的生化和病理效应
J Urol. 1996 Jan;155(1):213-9.
3
Report of a multicenter Canadian phase III randomized trial of 3 months vs. 8 months neoadjuvant androgen deprivation before standard-dose radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.加拿大一项多中心III期随机试验报告:针对临床局限性前列腺癌,在标准剂量放疗前进行3个月与8个月新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗的对比研究。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Sep 1;60(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.02.022.
4
Update on Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center studies of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心前列腺癌新辅助激素治疗研究进展
Mol Urol. 2000 Fall;4(3):241-8;discussion 249-50.
5
Phase I-II trial evaluating combined intensity-modulated radiotherapy and in situ gene therapy with or without hormonal therapy in treatment of prostate cancer-interim report on PSA response and biopsy data.评估调强放疗联合原位基因治疗加或不加激素治疗前列腺癌的I-II期试验——前列腺特异抗原反应及活检数据中期报告
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Apr 1;58(5):1520-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.083.
6
Optimal duration of neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal therapy before radical prostatectomy in clinically confined prostate cancer.临床局限性前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术前新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗的最佳持续时间。
Semin Urol Oncol. 1996 May;14(2 Suppl 2):39-45; discussion 46-7.
7
Neoadjuvant hormone therapy: the Canadian trials.新辅助激素治疗:加拿大的试验。
Mol Urol. 2000 Fall;4(3):233-7;discussion 239.
8
Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.使用基于前列腺特异性抗原密度和活检Gleason评分的新型风险分组系统改善根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的风险分层。
J Urol. 2002 Jul;168(1):110-5.
9
Radical prostatectomy and adjuvant endocrine therapy for prostate cancer with or without preoperative androgen deprivation: Five-year results.前列腺癌根治术及术前有无雄激素剥夺的辅助内分泌治疗:五年结果
Int J Urol. 2004 May;11(5):295-303. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00795.x.
10
Persistent prostate-specific antigen expression after neoadjuvant androgen depletion: an early predictor of relapse or incomplete androgen suppression.新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗后前列腺特异性抗原持续表达:复发或雄激素抑制不完全的早期预测指标。
Urology. 2006 Oct;68(4):834-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.04.016.

引用本文的文献

1
A retrospective study of neoadjuvant novel hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.一项关于高危前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术前行新辅助新型激素治疗的回顾性研究。
Front Oncol. 2025 Feb 19;15:1480861. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1480861. eCollection 2025.
2
Current Status of Neoadjuvant Treatment Before Surgery in High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer.高危局限性前列腺癌术前新辅助治疗的现状
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 31;17(1):99. doi: 10.3390/cancers17010099.
3
Comprehensive endometriosis care: a modern multimodal approach for the treatment of pelvic pain and endometriosis.
子宫内膜异位症综合护理:一种治疗盆腔疼痛和子宫内膜异位症的现代多模式方法。
Ther Adv Reprod Health. 2024 Sep 23;18:26334941241277759. doi: 10.1177/26334941241277759. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Lessons from the ACDC-RP trial: Clinical trial design for radical prostatectomy neoadjuvant therapy trials.ACDC-RP 试验的经验教训:根治性前列腺切除术新辅助治疗试验的临床试验设计
Oncotarget. 2024 Sep 30;15:660-661. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.28648.
5
Neoadjuvant lutetium PSMA, the TIME and immune response in high-risk localized prostate cancer.新辅助镥 PSMA、TIME 与高危局限性前列腺癌的免疫应答。
Nat Rev Urol. 2024 Nov;21(11):676-686. doi: 10.1038/s41585-024-00913-8. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
6
Neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer: a mini-review.高危前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术前行新辅助化疗激素治疗:一篇综述
Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2024 Feb 15;12(1):1-7. eCollection 2024.
7
Molecular features of prostate cancer after neoadjuvant therapy in the phase 3 CALGB 90203 trial.在 3 期 CALGB 90203 试验中,新辅助治疗后前列腺癌的分子特征。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Jan 10;116(1):115-126. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad184.
8
Neoadjuvant versus Concurrent Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer Treated with Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review of the Literature.新辅助雄激素剥夺疗法与同步雄激素剥夺疗法用于局部前列腺癌放疗的系统文献综述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 27;15(13):3363. doi: 10.3390/cancers15133363.
9
A cohort analysis of patients receiving neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy prior to robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy during the Covid-19 pandemic.对在新冠疫情期间接受机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术之前接受新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗的患者进行的队列分析。
J Clin Urol. 2023 Mar;16(2):131-139. doi: 10.1177/20514158211022216. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
10
Comparison of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy vs. extended pelvic lymph-node dissection in high-risk prostate cancer treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗高危前列腺癌中新辅助化疗联合激素治疗与扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的比较。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 1;13(1):3436. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30627-7.