问卷调查报告能否正确分类关系困扰和伴侣身体虐待情况？
Can questionnaire reports correctly classify relationship distress and partner physical abuse?
作者信息
Heyman R E, Feldbau-Kohn S R, Ehrensaft M K, Langhinrichsen-Rohling J, O'Leary K D
机构信息
Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794-2500, USA.
出版信息
J Fam Psychol. 2001 Jun;15(2):334-46. doi: 10.1037//0893-3200.15.2.334.
Relationship adjustment (e.g., Dyadic Adjustment Scale; DAS) and physical aggression (e.g., Conflict Tactics Scale) measures are used both as screening tools and as the sole criterion for classification. This study created face valid diagnostic interviews for relationship distress and physical abuse, through which one could compare preliminarily the classification properties of questionnaire reports. The DAS (and a global measure of relationship satisfaction) had modest agreement with a structured diagnostic interview; both questionnaires tended to overdiagnose distress compared with the interview. Results for partner abuse reiterated the need to go beyond occurrence of aggression as the sole diagnostic criterion, because men's aggression was more likely than women's to rise to the level of "abuse" when diagnostic criteria (injury or substantial fear) were applied.
关系调适（如二元调适量表；DAS）和身体攻击（如冲突策略量表）测量既用作筛查工具，也作为分类的唯一标准。本研究针对关系困扰和身体虐待编制了表面有效的诊断访谈，通过该访谈可以初步比较问卷报告的分类特性。DAS（以及关系满意度的总体测量）与结构化诊断访谈的一致性一般；与访谈相比，两份问卷都倾向于过度诊断困扰情况。伴侣虐待的结果再次表明，需要超越将攻击行为的发生作为唯一诊断标准，因为在应用诊断标准（伤害或严重恐惧）时，男性的攻击行为比女性的更有可能达到“虐待”程度。
Zotero 插件