• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病和糖耐量受损的新分类:一种批判性方法。

The new classification of diabetes mellitus and IGT: a critical approach.

作者信息

Borch-Johnsen K

机构信息

Steno Diabetes Centre, Niels Steensens Vej 2, DK 2820 Gentofte, Denmark.

出版信息

Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2001;109 Suppl 2:S86-93. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-18572.

DOI:10.1055/s-2001-18572
PMID:11460596
Abstract

In 1999 WHO published the new recommendations for diagnostic criteria for diabetes. The same publication introduced several new categories including the first proposal for diagnostic criteria for the metabolic syndrome. Also, WHO established a new category labelled "impaired fasting glycaemia", and thereafter this new group and the already established impaired glucose tolerance was combined as a common entity labelled "impaired glucose regulation".--These recommendations from WHO followed a decision in the American Diabetes Association to lower the diagnostic plasma glucose threshold for diabetes in the fasting state from 7.8 to 7.0 mmol/l and to use fasting values as the diagnostic test for diabetes. The suggested changes in the diagnostic criteria will include a new group of individuals as having diabetes, while others may be left undiagnosed if fasting glucose values are used as the only diagnostic criteria. The consequence of this has been analysed by several groups including the collaborative European activity (the DECODE-study).--This review summarises the findings. One major problem is that if fasting glucose values are used as the only diagnostic criteria in screening for diabetes, approximately one third of the diabetic individuals will be left undiagnosed. Furthermore, this group is the group of diabetic patients that have the highest mortality from cardiovascular disease and stroke, and the group with the worst cardiovascular risk profile compared to individuals with elevated fasting glucose values alone. This observation raises the need for a continued use of the oral glucose tolerance test in selected groups.

摘要

1999年,世界卫生组织(WHO)发布了糖尿病诊断标准的新建议。同一出版物引入了几个新类别,包括首次提出的代谢综合征诊断标准。此外,WHO设立了一个名为“空腹血糖受损”的新类别,此后,这个新类别与已有的糖耐量受损合并为一个共同的实体,称为“糖调节受损”。——WHO的这些建议是在美国糖尿病协会决定将空腹状态下糖尿病的诊断血浆葡萄糖阈值从7.8 mmol/l降至7.0 mmol/l,并将空腹血糖值用作糖尿病诊断测试之后提出的。诊断标准的建议变化将使一群新的个体被诊断为患有糖尿病,而如果仅将空腹血糖值用作唯一的诊断标准,其他一些人可能会漏诊。包括欧洲协作项目(DECODE研究)在内的几个研究小组已经分析了这种情况的后果。——这篇综述总结了研究结果。一个主要问题是,如果在糖尿病筛查中仅将空腹血糖值用作唯一的诊断标准,大约三分之一的糖尿病患者将漏诊。此外,与仅空腹血糖值升高的个体相比,这群糖尿病患者是心血管疾病和中风死亡率最高的群体,也是心血管风险状况最差的群体。这一观察结果表明,在特定人群中仍有必要继续使用口服葡萄糖耐量试验。

相似文献

1
The new classification of diabetes mellitus and IGT: a critical approach.糖尿病和糖耐量受损的新分类:一种批判性方法。
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2001;109 Suppl 2:S86-93. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-18572.
2
Comparison of The World Health Organization (WHO) two-step strategy and OGTT for diabetes mellitus screening.世界卫生组织(WHO)两步法策略与口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)用于糖尿病筛查的比较。
Acta Med Indones. 2004 Jan-Mar;36(1):3-7.
3
[New diagnostic criteria and classification of diabetes mellitus].[糖尿病新的诊断标准与分类]
Lijec Vjesn. 2000 May-Jun;122(5-6):99-102.
4
[Comparison of ADA and WHO diagnostic criteria for diabetes diagnosis and other categories of glucose intolerance ].[美国糖尿病协会(ADA)与世界卫生组织(WHO)糖尿病诊断及其他类别糖耐量异常诊断标准的比较]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2002 Oct;13(76):316-20.
5
The DECODE study. Diabetes epidemiology: collaborative analysis of diagnostic criteria in Europe.DECODE研究。糖尿病流行病学:欧洲诊断标准的协作分析。
Diabetes Metab. 2000 Sep;26(4):282-6.
6
New classification and criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The Australasian Working Party on Diagnostic Criteria for Diabetes Mellitus.糖尿病诊断的新分类与标准。澳大利亚糖尿病诊断标准工作小组。
N Z Med J. 1999 Apr 23;112(1086):139-41.
7
Diagnostic criteria of glucose intolerance and mortality.葡萄糖不耐受与死亡率的诊断标准。
Minerva Med. 2001 Apr;92(2):113-9.
8
Performance indicators and validity of serum fructosamine assay as a diagnostic test in a screening program for diabetes mellitus.血清果糖胺检测作为糖尿病筛查项目诊断试验的性能指标及有效性
Saudi Med J. 2003 May;24(5):477-84.
9
How to minimize missing those subjects with high 2HR plasma glucose but 'normal' fasting plasma glucose levels?如何尽量减少遗漏那些两小时血浆葡萄糖水平高但空腹血浆葡萄糖水平“正常”的受试者?
J Med. 2001;32(1-2):53-65.
10
[Prevalence of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance and abnormal fasting glucose in a high risk population. Data from the RIAD study using new diagnostic criteria for diabetes].[高危人群中新诊断2型糖尿病、糖耐量受损及空腹血糖异常的患病率。来自采用糖尿病新诊断标准的RIAD研究的数据]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1999 Sep 17;124(37):1057-61. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1024481.

引用本文的文献

1
CTRP3 is a novel biomarker for diabetic retinopathy and inhibits HGHL-induced VCAM-1 expression in an AMPK-dependent manner.CTRP3是糖尿病视网膜病变的一种新型生物标志物,并以AMPK依赖的方式抑制高糖高渗诱导的VCAM-1表达。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 20;12(6):e0178253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178253. eCollection 2017.
2
Circulating C1q complement/TNF-related protein (CTRP) 1, CTRP9, CTRP12 and CTRP13 concentrations in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: In vivo regulation by glucose.2型糖尿病患者循环中C1q补体/TNF相关蛋白(CTRP)1、CTRP9、CTRP12和CTRP13的浓度:葡萄糖的体内调节作用
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 16;12(2):e0172271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172271. eCollection 2017.
3
Prevalence of Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Diseases in Bangladesh: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
孟加拉国心血管疾病风险因素的患病率:系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 5;11(8):e0160180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160180. eCollection 2016.
4
Low serum cartonectin/CTRP3 concentrations in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: in vivo regulation of cartonectin by glucose.新诊断2型糖尿病患者血清软骨连蛋白/CTRP3浓度较低:葡萄糖对软骨连蛋白的体内调节作用
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 19;9(11):e112931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112931. eCollection 2014.
5
Cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes in Bangladesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies between 1995 and 2010.孟加拉国的心血管疾病和 2 型糖尿病:1995 年至 2010 年期间研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 13;12:434. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-434.
6
Plasma levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine in patients with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.经活检证实的非酒精性脂肪性肝病患者的血浆不对称二甲基精氨酸水平。
Metabolism. 2011 Jun;60(6):776-81. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2010.07.027. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
7
What is the relationship between exercise and metabolic abnormalities? A review of the metabolic syndrome.运动与代谢异常之间的关系是什么?代谢综合征综述。
Sports Med. 2004;34(6):371-418. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200434060-00004.