• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期护理与养老院保险:成年子女能否替代保险政策?

Long-term care and nursing home coverage: are adult children substitutes for insurance policies?

作者信息

Mellor J M

机构信息

Department of Economics, The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795, USA.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2001 Jul;20(4):527-47. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00078-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00078-9
PMID:11463187
Abstract

Recent theoretical work suggests that in some cases, parents will forego the purchase of long-term care insurance and rely on child-provided care in old age. This paper uses data from the Asset and Health Dynamics survey and the Panel Study of Income Dynamics to examine whether the availability of children and other potential caregivers explains why so few elderly persons have long-term care insurance. In contrast to the notion that family members serve as substitutes for long-term care insurance, variables measuring the availability of informal caregivers have no statistically significant effect in models of insurance ownership and models of intentions to purchase insurance.

摘要

近期的理论研究表明,在某些情况下,父母会放弃购买长期护理保险,转而依赖子女在其老年时提供的照料。本文利用资产与健康动态调查以及收入动态面板研究的数据,来检验子女及其他潜在照料者的可获得性是否能够解释为何仅有极少数老年人拥有长期护理保险。与家庭成员可替代长期护理保险这一观点相反,衡量非正式照料者可获得性的变量,在保险拥有情况模型和购买保险意向模型中均无统计学上的显著影响。

相似文献

1
Long-term care and nursing home coverage: are adult children substitutes for insurance policies?长期护理与养老院保险:成年子女能否替代保险政策?
J Health Econ. 2001 Jul;20(4):527-47. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00078-9.
2
The silent crisis: women and the need for long-term care insurance. Part 2.无声的危机:女性与长期护理保险的需求。第二部分。
Caring. 2003 Nov;22(11):32-6, 38.
3
The impact of private long-term care insurance on the use of long-term care.私人长期护理保险对长期护理使用情况的影响。
Inquiry. 2011 Spring;48(1):34-50. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_48.01.05.
4
Effects of family caregivers on the use of formal long-term care in South Korea.家庭照料者对韩国正规长期护理使用的影响。
Int Nurs Rev. 2013 Dec;60(4):520-7. doi: 10.1111/inr.12057. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
5
Almost optimal social insurance for long-term care.近乎最优的长期护理社会保险。
Dev Health Econ Public Policy. 1996;5:307-29. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4096-0_15.
6
Patterns of informal and formal caregiving among elders with private long-term care insurance.拥有私人长期护理保险的老年人的非正式和正式护理模式。
Gerontologist. 2001 Apr;41(2):180-7. doi: 10.1093/geront/41.2.180.
7
Long-term care insurance: Does experience matter?长期护理保险:经验重要吗?
J Health Econ. 2015 Mar;40:122-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
8
Long-term care insurance and trust saving in a two-generation model.两代模型中的长期护理保险与信托储蓄
Dev Health Econ Public Policy. 1996;5:225-50. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4096-0_12.
9
Multiple Dimensions of Private Information: Evidence from the Long-Term Care Insurance Market.私人信息的多维性:来自长期护理保险市场的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2006 Sep 1;96(4):938-958. doi: 10.1257/aer.96.4.938.
10
Possible reforms for financing long-term care.
J Econ Perspect. 1992 Summer;6(3):43-58. doi: 10.1257/jep.6.3.43.

引用本文的文献

1
Moral hazard and long-term care insurance.道德风险与长期护理保险
Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract. 2019 Apr;44(2):231-251. doi: 10.1057/s41288-018-00119-1. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
2
What Can Economics Say about Alzheimer's Disease?经济学对阿尔茨海默病能有何见解?
J Econ Lit. 2023 Jun;61(2):428-470. doi: 10.1257/jel.20211660.
3
The Unseen Shift: How Partnership Long-term Care Insurance Influences Caregiving Among Older Adults.无形的转变:伙伴长期护理保险如何影响老年人的护理工作
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Dec 1;79(12). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae168.
4
A scoping review of the impact of ageing on individual consumers' insurance purchase intentions.关于老龄化对个人消费者保险购买意愿影响的范围综述。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 7;10(18):e37501. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37501. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.
5
Family spillovers and long-term care insurance.家庭溢出效应与长期护理保险。
J Health Econ. 2023 Jul;90:102781. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2023.102781. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
6
The effect of long-term care public benefits and insurance on informal care from outside the household: empirical evidence from Italy and Spain.长期护理公共福利和保险对家庭外非正式护理的影响:来自意大利和西班牙的经验证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Nov;21(8):1131-1147. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01215-7. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
7
Does COVID-2019 have an Impact on the Purchase Intention of Commercial Long-Term Care Insurance among the Elderly in China?新型冠状病毒肺炎对中国老年人商业长期护理保险购买意愿有影响吗?
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 May 6;8(2):126. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020126.
8
Family transfers and long-term care: An analysis of the WHO Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE).家庭转移与长期护理:对世界卫生组织全球老龄化与成人健康研究(SAGE)的分析。
J Econ Ageing. 2018 Nov;12:195-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jeoa.2017.08.003.
9
Means-tested public support and the interaction between long-term care insurance and informal care.收入调查型公共支持以及长期护理保险与非正式护理之间的相互作用。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2016 Dec 24. doi: 10.1007/s10754-016-9206-4.
10
Who Wants Long-Term Care Insurance? A Stated Preference Survey of Attitudes, Beliefs, and Characteristics.谁需要长期护理保险?一项关于态度、信念和特征的陈述偏好调查。
Inquiry. 2016 Aug 16;53. doi: 10.1177/0046958016663728. Print 2016.