Plaud B, Debaene B, Donati F
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Anesthesiology. 2001 Jul;95(1):96-101. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200107000-00019.
Some studies suggest that the orbicularis oculi is resistant to neuromuscular blocking drugs and behaves like laryngeal muscles. Others report little or no difference between the orbicularis oculi and the adductor pollicis. These discrepancies could be related to the exact site of recording. The purpose of this study was to compare two monitoring sites around the eye with the adductor pollicis and the laryngeal adductor muscles.
After institutional approval and informed consent, the evoked response to train-of-four stimulation was measured in 12 patients by acceleromyography at the thumb (adductor pollicis), the eyelid (orbicularis oculi), and the superciliary arch (corrugator supercilii) after 0.5 mg/kg rocuronium during propofol-fentanyl-nitrous oxide anesthesia. In 12 other patients, laryngeal adductor neuromuscular blockade was assessed via the cuff of the tracheal tube and compared with the adductor pollicis and the corrugator supercilii after 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium.
After 0.5 mg/kg, maximum blockade (%T1, mean +/- SD) was less at the corrugator supercilii (80+/-20%) than at the adductor pollicis (100+/-1%) and the orbicularis oculi (93+/-8%) (P < 0.01). Clinical duration (25%T1) was shorter at the corrugator supercilii (12+/-7 min) than at the adductor pollicis (25+/-4 min) and orbicularis oculi (24+/-10 min) (P < 0.01). After 0.6 mg/kg, maximum blockade was similar at the corrugator supercilii (88+/-8%) and the laryngeal adductor muscles (89+/-11%). Clinical duration at the corrugator supercilii and the laryngeal adductors was 17+/-7 and 17+/-10 min, respectively.
Muscles around the eye vary in their response to rocuronium. The response of the superciliary arch (corrugator supercilii) reflects blockade of laryngeal adductor muscles. However, the eyelid (orbicularis oculi) and thumb (adductor pollicis) have similar sensitivities.
一些研究表明,眼轮匝肌对神经肌肉阻滞药物有抵抗力,其表现类似于喉肌。另一些研究则报告眼轮匝肌和拇内收肌之间几乎没有差异或没有差异。这些差异可能与记录的确切部位有关。本研究的目的是比较眼部周围的两个监测部位与拇内收肌和喉内收肌。
经机构批准并获得知情同意后,在丙泊酚-芬太尼-氧化亚氮麻醉下,对12例患者静脉注射0.5mg/kg罗库溴铵后,通过加速度肌电图测量拇指(拇内收肌)、眼睑(眼轮匝肌)和眉弓(皱眉肌)对四个成串刺激的诱发反应。在另外12例患者中,通过气管导管套囊评估喉内收肌的神经肌肉阻滞情况,并与0.6mg/kg罗库溴铵后的拇内收肌和皱眉肌进行比较。
注射0.5mg/kg罗库溴铵后,皱眉肌的最大阻滞程度(%T1,平均值±标准差)低于拇内收肌(100±1%)和眼轮匝肌(93±8%)(P<0.01),分别为80±20%。皱眉肌的临床作用时间(25%T1)短于拇内收肌(25±4分钟)和眼轮匝肌(24±10分钟),分别为12±7分钟(P<0.01)。注射0.6mg/kg罗库溴铵后,皱眉肌(88±8%)和喉内收肌的最大阻滞程度相似(89±11%)。皱眉肌和喉内收肌的临床作用时间分别为17±7分钟和17±10分钟。
眼部周围的肌肉对罗库溴铵的反应各不相同。眉弓(皱眉肌)的反应反映了喉内收肌的阻滞情况。然而,眼睑(眼轮匝肌)和拇指(拇内收肌)具有相似的敏感性。