On the role of static and dynamic visual afferent information in goal-directed aiming movements.

Movement planning has been shown to be optimized when the participant is permitted to see his or her hand resting on the starting base prior to movement initiation. However, this proposition is opposed by contradictory results. In the present study, we wanted to determine whether these conflicting results were caused by procedural differences. The results showed that seeing one's hand on the starting base did not result in more accurate aiming movement than when this information was not available. However, lower aiming errors were found when one was asked to foveate the starting base and then the target prior to movement initiation, but only when no dynamic visual information was available during movement. When an aiming movement was performed while one's hand was visible in visual periphery, foveating the starting base or not prior to movement initiation did not modify aiming accuracy. These results suggest that gazing at the starting base and then at the target provides an eye-based representation of the movement to be performed that can be used by the CNS to plan a manual aiming movement. Information for better planning of the direction--but not the extent--dimension of an upcoming movement can also be derived from dynamic visual information available in peripheral vision.