• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格解体严重程度量表的编制。

Development of a depersonalization severity scale.

作者信息

Simeon D, Guralnik O, Schmeidler J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma Stress. 2001 Apr;14(2):341-9. doi: 10.1023/A:1011169019614.

DOI:10.1023/A:1011169019614
PMID:11469161
Abstract

Our aim was to develop a clinician-rated scale assessing depersonalization severity for use in clinical trials of Depersonalization Disorder and trauma-related disorders in general. The 6-item Depersonalization Severity Scale (DSS) was administered to 63 participants with DSM-IV Depersonalization Disorder as diagnosed by the SCID-D, and its psychometric properties were examined. The sensitivity of the DSS and of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) to treatment change was assessed in blinded, controlled settings. Individual items were widely distributed across the severity range. Interrater reliability was excellent and internal consistency was moderate. The DSS had high convergent and discriminant validity and was sensitive to treatment change. The DES was also sensitive to treatment change. We recommend piloting the DSS in future treatment trials of trauma-spectrum disorders.

摘要

我们的目标是开发一种由临床医生评定的量表,用于评估人格解体的严重程度,以用于人格解体障碍及一般创伤相关障碍的临床试验。对63名经SCID-D诊断为DSM-IV人格解体障碍的参与者施测了包含6个条目的人格解体严重程度量表(DSS),并对其心理测量特性进行了检验。在盲法对照环境中评估了DSS和分离体验量表(DES)对治疗变化的敏感性。各个条目在严重程度范围内分布广泛。评分者间信度极佳,内部一致性为中等。DSS具有较高的聚合效度和区分效度,且对治疗变化敏感。DES对治疗变化也很敏感。我们建议在未来创伤谱系障碍的治疗试验中试用DSS。

相似文献

1
Development of a depersonalization severity scale.人格解体严重程度量表的编制。
J Trauma Stress. 2001 Apr;14(2):341-9. doi: 10.1023/A:1011169019614.
2
[Study of dissociative disorders and depersonalization in a sample of young adult French population].[法国年轻成年人群样本中分离性障碍和人格解体的研究]
Encephale. 2001 Nov-Dec;27(6):559-69.
3
A severity rating scale for body dysmorphic disorder: development, reliability, and validity of a modified version of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale.躯体变形障碍严重程度评定量表:耶鲁-布朗强迫量表修订版的编制、信度及效度
Psychopharmacol Bull. 1997;33(1):17-22.
4
Examination of the pathological dissociation taxon in depersonalization disorder.人格解体障碍中病理性解离分类的检查。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2003 Nov;191(11):738-44. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000095126.21206.3e.
5
Convergent and discriminant validity of the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale-Symptom Checklist.儿童耶鲁-布朗强迫量表症状清单的聚合效度和区分效度。
J Anxiety Disord. 2008 Dec;22(8):1369-76. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.01.017. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
6
Development and validation of a new procedure for the diagnostic assessment of personality disorder: the Multidimensional Personality Disorder Rating Scale (MPDRS).一种用于人格障碍诊断评估的新方法的开发与验证:多维人格障碍评定量表(MPDRS)。
J Pers Disord. 2008 Jun;22(3):246-58. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2008.22.3.246.
7
Studies of the reliability and validity of the Addiction Severity Index.成瘾严重程度指数的信度和效度研究。
Addiction. 2004 Apr;99(4):398-410; discussion 411-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00665.x.
8
Validity and reliability of the Hamilton depression rating scale (5 items) for manic and mixed bipolar disorders.汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(5项)用于躁狂和混合性双相情感障碍的效度与信度
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2009 Sep;197(9):682-6. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181b3b3a0.
9
Development and reliability of the HAM-D/MADRS interview: an integrated depression symptom rating scale.汉密尔顿抑郁量表/蒙哥马利-艾森伯格抑郁评定量表访谈的开发与信度:一种综合抑郁症状评定量表
Psychiatry Res. 2006 Nov 29;145(1):21-37. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.10.009. Epub 2006 Oct 16.
10
Development and psychometric characteristics of the Dissociation Tension Scale.分离张力量表的编制及心理测量学特征。
J Pers Assess. 2010 May;92(3):269-77. doi: 10.1080/00223891003670232.

引用本文的文献

1
The Association between Self-Reported Self-Disturbance Phenomena and Personal Recovery in Patients with a Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder, Siblings and Controls.精神分裂症谱系障碍患者、其兄弟姐妹及对照组中自我报告的自我干扰现象与个人康复之间的关联
Psychopathology. 2025 May 28:1-22. doi: 10.1159/000546557.
2
Assessing dissociation: A systematic review and evaluation of existing measures.评估解离:对现有测量方法的系统综述与评价
J Psychiatr Res. 2025 Jan;181:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.11.040. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
3
A case series of 223 patients with depersonalization-derealization syndrome.
一组223例人格解体-现实解体综合征患者的病例系列。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jun 27;16:203. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0908-4.
4
Disturbed Experience of Self: Psychometric Analysis of the Self-Experience Lifetime Frequency Scale (SELF).自我体验紊乱:自我体验终生频率量表(SELF)的心理测量分析
Psychopathology. 2016;49(2):69-76. doi: 10.1159/000441952. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
5
Evidence-based treatment for Depersonalisation-derealisation Disorder (DPRD).基于证据的人格解体-现实解体障碍(DPRD)治疗。
BMC Psychol. 2013 Oct 28;1(1):20. doi: 10.1186/2050-7283-1-20. eCollection 2013.
6
Prevalence and correlates of depersonalization in students aged 12-18 years in Germany.德国12至18岁学生人格解体的患病率及其相关因素。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;50(6):995-1003. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0957-2. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
7
Validity and reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for Depersonalization-Derealization Spectrum (SCI-DER).失认证和人格解体症状谱的结构性临床访谈(SCI-DER)的有效性和可靠性。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2008 Oct;4(5):977-86. doi: 10.2147/ndt.s3622.