Lerner J S, Keltner D
Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213-3890, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Jul;81(1):146-59. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.81.1.146.
Drawing on an appraisal-tendency framework (J. S. Lerner & D. Keltner, 2000), the authors predicted and found that fear and anger have opposite effects on risk perception. Whereas fearful people expressed pessimistic risk estimates and risk-averse choices, angry people expressed optimistic risk estimates and risk-seeking choices. These opposing patterns emerged for naturally occurring and experimentally induced fear and anger. Moreover, estimates of angry people more closely resembled those of happy people than those of fearful people. Consistent with predictions, appraisal tendencies accounted for these effects: Appraisals of certainty and control moderated and (in the case of control) mediated the emotion effects. As a complement to studies that link affective valence to judgment outcomes, the present studies highlight multiple benefits of studying specific emotions.
作者借鉴评估倾向框架(J.S.勒纳和D.凯尔特纳,2000年),预测并发现恐惧和愤怒对风险认知有相反的影响。恐惧的人表达出悲观的风险估计和规避风险的选择,而愤怒的人则表达出乐观的风险估计和寻求风险的选择。这些相反的模式在自然产生的以及实验诱发的恐惧和愤怒中都出现了。此外,愤怒的人的估计与快乐的人的估计比与恐惧的人的估计更为相似。与预测一致,评估倾向解释了这些影响:对确定性和控制的评估调节了情绪影响(对于控制而言)并在其中起到了中介作用。作为将情感效价与判断结果联系起来的研究的补充,本研究突出了研究特定情绪的多重益处。