• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种快速自动药敏试验系统的实验室评估:一项合作研究报告

Laboratory evaluation of a rapid, automatic susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study.

作者信息

Thornsberry C, Gavan T L, Sherris J C, Balows A, Matsen J M, Sabath L D, Schoenknecht F, Thrupp L D, Washington J A

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Apr;7(4):466-80. doi: 10.1128/AAC.7.4.466.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.7.4.466
PMID:1147582
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC429164/
Abstract

Seven laboratories participated in a collaborative study to evaluate the Autobac 1 system. Results obtained with this assay system were compared to those obtained by the standardized Bauer-Kirby disk diffusion test, and each of these two methods was compared to the agar dilution technique. Comparison of the Autobac 1 and the disk diffusion results from the seven laboratories showed an overall average of 91.5% interpretive agreement with the 17 antimicrobial agents tested. The distribution in the levels of Autobac 1/disk diffusion agreement was such that with 13 antimicrobial drugs agreement was 90% or higher; with three, between 85 and 90%; and with one, 77% (nitrofurantoin). Comparison of the Autobac 1 and disk diffusion tests with the International Collaborative Study agar dilution test showed that both methods gave levels of agreement with the International Collaborative Study agar dilution technique that were generally high and equivalent. The average overall agreement between the agar dilution test and each of the other two methods was approximately 90%. Disagreements that did occur tended to involve organisms that were drug susceptible by the Autobac 1 system but intermediate or resistant by the other two methods. This was in part due to the narrow intermediate interpretive zone of the Autobac 1 test. In reproducibility studies with the Autobac 1 and disk diffusion methods, no significant differences were observed between the interpretive reproducibility of the two methods.

摘要

七个实验室参与了一项合作研究,以评估自动细菌鉴定仪1系统。将该检测系统获得的结果与标准化的鲍尔-柯克斯纸片扩散法获得的结果进行比较,并将这两种方法中的每一种与琼脂稀释技术进行比较。七个实验室对自动细菌鉴定仪1和纸片扩散法的结果进行比较,结果显示,对于所检测的17种抗菌药物,总体平均解释一致性为91.5%。自动细菌鉴定仪1/纸片扩散法一致性水平的分布情况如下:13种抗菌药物的一致性为90%或更高;3种在85%至90%之间;1种为77%(呋喃妥因)。将自动细菌鉴定仪1和纸片扩散法与国际合作研究琼脂稀释试验进行比较,结果表明,这两种方法与国际合作研究琼脂稀释技术的一致性水平总体较高且相当。琼脂稀释试验与其他两种方法各自之间的总体平均一致性约为90%。确实出现的不一致情况往往涉及那些通过自动细菌鉴定仪1系统检测为药物敏感,但通过其他两种方法检测为中介或耐药的微生物。这部分是由于自动细菌鉴定仪1试验的中介解释区较窄。在对自动细菌鉴定仪1和纸片扩散法进行的重复性研究中,未观察到两种方法在解释重复性方面存在显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ef/429164/38d9c3bdee86/aac00322-0088-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ef/429164/38d9c3bdee86/aac00322-0088-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ef/429164/38d9c3bdee86/aac00322-0088-a.jpg

相似文献

1
Laboratory evaluation of a rapid, automatic susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study.一种快速自动药敏试验系统的实验室评估:一项合作研究报告
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Apr;7(4):466-80. doi: 10.1128/AAC.7.4.466.
2
Wide variability in Pseudomonas aeruginosa aminoglycoside results among seven susceptibility testing procedures.七种药敏试验方法检测铜绿假单胞菌氨基糖苷类药物结果存在广泛差异。
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Oct;27(10):2277-85. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.10.2277-2285.1989.
3
Laboratory evaluation of amikacin susceptibility testing by the AutoBac I system.使用自动细菌鉴定仪I系统对阿米卡星药敏试验进行实验室评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Mar;9(3):397-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.9.3.397-398.1979.
4
Laboratory evaluation of an automated antimicrobial susceptibility system.一种自动化抗菌药敏系统的实验室评估
Am J Clin Pathol. 1977 Dec;68(6):769-777. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/68.6.769.
5
Alternative quality control parameters for Autobac susceptibility testing disks: use of agar diffusion zone size results.用于自动细菌鉴定药敏试验药敏纸片的替代质量控制参数:琼脂扩散法抑菌圈大小结果的应用
J Clin Microbiol. 1981 May;13(5):814-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.5.814-817.1981.
6
Rapid determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations of antimicrobial agents by the Autobac method: a collaborative study.用自动细菌鉴定药敏分析仪方法快速测定抗菌药物的最低抑菌浓度:一项协作研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 May;17(5):824-33. doi: 10.1128/AAC.17.5.824.
7
Examination of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-gentamicin discrepancies encountered in an Autobac I-disk diffusion comparison.对在自动细菌鉴定仪I-纸片扩散法比较中遇到的铜绿假单胞菌与庆大霉素的差异进行检测。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Mar;21(3):412-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.21.3.412.
8
Agar disk diffusion for the quality control testing of Autobac elution disks.用于自动细菌洗脱药敏纸片质量控制检测的琼脂扩散法。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Mar;21(3):516-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.21.3.516.
9
Evaluation of the Autobac 1 susceptibility testing system in a clinical diagnostic laboratory.临床诊断实验室中自动细菌鉴定仪1药敏试验系统的评估
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 Apr;11(4):750-2. doi: 10.1128/AAC.11.4.750.
10
Examination of major disagreements in susceptibility test results by Autobac-1 and MS-2.通过自动细菌鉴定仪-1(Autobac-1)和MS-2检测药敏试验结果中的主要差异。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Jul;20(1):115-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.20.1.115.

引用本文的文献

1
In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods: agar dilution to 3D tissue-engineered models.体外抗菌药敏试验方法:琼脂稀释法至 3D 组织工程模型。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Feb;37(2):187-208. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3089-2. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
2
In vitroSusceptibility of β-Lactamase Positive and β-Lactamase Negative Strains ofNeisseria gonorrhœœto Cefuroxime.淋病奈瑟菌β-内酰胺酶阳性和β-内酰胺酶阴性菌株对头孢呋辛的体外敏感性
Proc R Soc Med. 1977;70(Suppl 9):122-4. doi: 10.1177/00359157770700S927.
3
Comparison of direct and standardized testing of infected urine for antimicrobial susceptibilities by disk diffusion.

本文引用的文献

1
Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method.采用标准化单纸片法进行抗生素敏感性试验。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1966 Apr;45(4):493-6.
2
Prototype of a fully automated device for determination of bacterial antibiotic susceptibility in the clinical laboratory.临床实验室中用于测定细菌抗生素敏感性的全自动设备原型。
Appl Microbiol. 1971 Dec;22(6):980-6. doi: 10.1128/am.22.6.980-986.1971.
3
Antibiotic sensitivity testing. Report of an international collaborative study.抗生素敏感性试验。一项国际合作研究报告。
通过纸片扩散法对感染尿液进行抗菌药物敏感性直接检测与标准化检测的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jan;32(1):40-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.1.40-45.1994.
4
Evaluation of Alamar colorimetric MIC method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacteria.用于革兰氏阴性菌抗菌药敏试验的阿拉玛比色法最低抑菌浓度(MIC)测定方法的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 May;32(5):1261-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.5.1261-1267.1994.
5
Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing for acute urinary tract infections in women.女性急性尿路感染的直接药敏试验
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Sep;33(9):2316-23. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2316-2323.1995.
6
Effect of contamination levels on antimicrobial susceptibilities tested by Autobac I.污染水平对自动细菌鉴定仪I检测的抗菌药物敏感性的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Mar;17(3):389-92. doi: 10.1128/AAC.17.3.389.
7
Clinical evaluation of automated antibiotic susceptibility testing with the MS-2 system.使用MS-2系统进行自动抗生素敏感性测试的临床评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Oct;12(4):527-32. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.4.527-532.1980.
8
Rapid determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations of antimicrobial agents by the Autobac method: a collaborative study.用自动细菌鉴定药敏分析仪方法快速测定抗菌药物的最低抑菌浓度:一项协作研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 May;17(5):824-33. doi: 10.1128/AAC.17.5.824.
9
Rapid determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations of antimicrobial agents by regression analysis of light scattering data.通过光散射数据的回归分析快速测定抗菌剂的最低抑菌浓度。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 May;17(5):813-23. doi: 10.1128/AAC.17.5.813.
10
Comparison of drug sensitivity testing with microdilution quantitative minimum inhibitory concentration and the Autobac I system.采用微量稀释法定量测定最低抑菌浓度与Autobac I系统进行药敏试验的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1980 May;11(5):465-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.11.5.465-469.1980.
Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B Microbiol Immunol. 1971;217:Suppl 217:1+.