Hampton J R, Harrison M J, Mitchell J R, Prichard J S, Seymour C
Br Med J. 1975 May 31;2(5969):486-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5969.486.
To evaluate the relative importance of the medical history, the physical examination, and laboratory investigations in the diagnosis and management of medical outpatients some physicians recorded their diagnosis and a prediction of the method of managementafter reading the patient's referral letter, again after taking the history, and againafter performing the physical examination. These diagnoses and predictions were compared with the diagnosis and method of management which had been adopted two months after the patient's initial attendance. A diagnosis that agreed with the one finally accepted was made after reading the referral letter and taking the history in 66 out of 80 new patients; the physical examination was useful in only seven patients, and the laboratory investigations in a further seven. In only one of six patients in whom the physician was unable to make any diagnosis after taking the history and examining the patient did laboratory investigations lead to a positive diagnosis.
为评估病史、体格检查和实验室检查在门诊患者诊断及治疗中的相对重要性,一些医生记录了他们在阅读患者转诊信后、问诊后以及体格检查后的诊断和治疗方法预测。这些诊断和预测与患者首次就诊两个月后采用的诊断和治疗方法进行了比较。在80例新患者中,有66例在阅读转诊信并问诊后做出了与最终接受的诊断一致的诊断;体格检查仅对7例患者有用,实验室检查对另外7例患者有用。在6例医生在问诊和检查患者后仍无法做出任何诊断的患者中,只有1例通过实验室检查得出了阳性诊断。