Chu M W, Dewar L R, Burgess J J, Busse E G
Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Regina Health District, Sask.
Can J Surg. 2001 Aug;44(4):284-8.
To assess the hypothesis that empyema thoracis (ET) is a problem often not optimally treated. Long delays in diagnosis are common, long hospital stays are typical and recovery with surgery is relatively rapid.
A chart review.
The Regina Health District associated hospitals, a tertiary referral centre.
The charts of 34 consecutive patients having primary respiratory tract disease and seen during the 6-year period Apr. 1, 1991, to Mar. 31, 1997, were identified.
Patient presentation, time until diagnosis of ET, number of radiologic investigations, microbiologic features, treatment methods, postoperative course and mortality.
The mean delay in diagnosis, defined as the time of admission to the time of correct diagnosis, was 44.2 days (range from 0 to 573 days) and the mean delay until thoracic surgery referral was 47.4 days (range from 0 to 578 days). On average each patient underwent CT 10.1 times, had 2.6 percutaneous drainage procedures and 2.0 chest tube insertions. The mean time from the first percutaneous chest drainage to the date of diagnosis was 29.8 days (range from 0 to 564 days). Of the 26 patients who underwent CT, the mean time from the first CT of the chest to the date of diagnosis was 9.5 days (range from 0 to 75 days). Cultures of pleural fluid grew no organisms in 17 patients; in the remaining 17 patients cultures grew 23 different microorganisms. Of 26 patients who were referred for surgical opinion, 18 underwent decortication; 8 were not considered to be surgical candidates. Pathological examination showed 17 cases of inflammatory empyema and 1 case of mesothelioma (unrecognized clinically). The mean length of hospital stay postoperatively was 15.2 days.
Early suspicion of ET facilitates its treatment, resulting in fewer investigations and shorter hospital stays. When percutaneous drainage does not eliminate pleural effusions, empyema must be considered. Recovery from surgical decortication is rapid in comparison with the typical protracted preoperative hospital course.
评估脓胸(ET)常未得到最佳治疗这一假说。诊断延迟常见,住院时间长很典型,手术恢复相对较快。
病历回顾。
里贾纳健康区相关医院,一家三级转诊中心。
确定了1991年4月1日至1997年3月31日这6年期间连续34例患有原发性呼吸道疾病患者的病历。
患者表现、直至诊断出ET的时间、放射学检查次数、微生物学特征、治疗方法、术后病程及死亡率。
诊断延迟的平均时间(定义为入院至正确诊断的时间)为44.2天(范围为0至573天),直至转介至胸外科手术的平均延迟时间为47.4天(范围为0至578天)。平均每位患者接受CT检查10.1次,进行经皮引流2.6次,插入胸管2.0次。从首次经皮胸腔引流至诊断日期的平均时间为29.8天(范围为0至564天)。在接受CT检查的26例患者中,从首次胸部CT至诊断日期的平均时间为9.5天(范围为0至75天)。17例患者的胸水培养未生长出微生物;其余17例患者的培养物生长出23种不同微生物。在被转介寻求手术意见的26例患者中,18例接受了胸膜剥脱术;8例未被视为手术候选者。病理检查显示17例为炎性脓胸,1例为间皮瘤(临床未识别)。术后平均住院时间为15.2天。
早期怀疑ET有助于其治疗,从而减少检查次数并缩短住院时间。当经皮引流不能消除胸腔积液时,必须考虑脓胸。与典型的术前漫长住院病程相比,手术胸膜剥脱术后恢复较快。