• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妇产科风险呈现的新工具。

New tool for presenting risk in obstetrics and gynecology.

作者信息

Stallings S P, Paling J E

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1066, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Aug;98(2):345-9. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01182-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01182-0
PMID:11510463
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Paling Perspective Scale, a means of communicating risk in various settings, has been applied to diverse fields such as nuclear power, blood banking, and ophthalmology.

TECHNIQUE

Statistics of risk for various events in obstetrics and gynecology were collected from the literature and directly applied to the risk scale.

EXPERIENCE

The graphic simplicity and versatility of this scale make it adaptable for communicating risks to people of different technical and educational backgrounds.

CONCLUSION

The Paling Perspective Scale might help obstetrician-gynecologists obtain informed consent for surgery, genetic counseling, and other topics.

摘要

背景

帕林风险透视量表是一种在各种场景下传达风险的工具,已应用于核电、血库和眼科等多个领域。

技术

从文献中收集妇产科各种事件的风险统计数据,并直接应用于该风险量表。

经验

该量表图形简单且用途广泛,适用于向不同技术和教育背景的人群传达风险。

结论

帕林风险透视量表可能有助于妇产科医生在手术、遗传咨询及其他主题方面获得知情同意。

相似文献

1
New tool for presenting risk in obstetrics and gynecology.妇产科风险呈现的新工具。
Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Aug;98(2):345-9. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01182-0.
2
Physician's gender, communication style, patient preferences and patient satisfaction in gynecology and obstetrics: a systematic review.妇产科医生的性别、沟通方式、患者偏好和患者满意度:系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Nov;89(2):221-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.034. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
3
Ethically justified guidelines for defining sexual boundaries between obstetrician-gynecologists and their patients.关于界定妇产科医生与其患者之间性界限的伦理合理指南。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Aug;175(2):496-500. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70169-2.
4
How virtual reality may enhance training in obstetrics and gynecology.虚拟现实如何增强妇产科培训。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Sep;187(3 Suppl):S37-40. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.127361.
5
A comparison of medical litigation filed against obstetrics and gynecology, internal medicine, and surgery departments.针对妇产科、内科和外科部门的医疗诉讼比较。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Oct 24;16(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0065-1.
6
Cause and effect analysis of closed claims in obstetrics and gynecology.妇产科闭合性医疗纠纷索赔的因果关系分析
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;105(5 Pt 1):1031-8. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000158864.09443.77.
7
[Informed consent in gynecology and obstetrics].[妇产科中的知情同意]
Ceska Gynekol. 2006 Jan;71(1):74-8.
8
Obstetrics and gynaecology residents' knowledge of the informed consent process and its practice in their training institutions.妇产科住院医师对知情同意过程的了解及其在培训机构中的实践情况。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2015 Jul-Aug;18(4):445-52. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.151787.
9
Job satisfaction among obstetrician-gynecologists: a comparison between private practice physicians and academic physicians.妇产科医生的工作满意度:私人执业医生与学术型医生的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Nov;195(5):1474-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.039. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
10
Improving obstetrician-gynecologist implementation of smoking cessation guidelines for pregnant women: an interim report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.提高妇产科医生对孕妇戒烟指南的执行情况:美国妇产科医师学会的中期报告
Nicotine Tob Res. 2004 Apr;6 Suppl 2:S253-7. doi: 10.1080/14622200410001669123.

引用本文的文献

1
Communicating personalized risks from COVID-19: guidelines from an empirical study.传达COVID-19的个性化风险:一项实证研究的指导方针。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Apr 21;8(4):201721. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201721.
2
A usability problem: conveying health risks to consumers on the Internet.一个可用性问题:在互联网上向消费者传达健康风险。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:427-35. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
3
How well do commonly used data presentation formats support comparative effectiveness evaluations?常用的数据呈现格式在支持比较疗效评估方面的表现如何?
Med Decis Making. 2012 Nov-Dec;32(6):840-50. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12445284. Epub 2012 May 22.
4
What do we know about communicating risk? A brief review and suggestion for contextualising serious, but rare, risk, and the example of cox-2 selective and non-selective NSAIDs.我们对风险沟通了解多少?对严重但罕见风险的背景化进行简要回顾与建议,并以环氧化酶-2选择性和非选择性非甾体抗炎药为例
Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10(1):R20. doi: 10.1186/ar2373. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
5
Design features of graphs in health risk communication: a systematic review.健康风险沟通中图表的设计特点:一项系统综述
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Nov-Dec;13(6):608-18. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2115. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
6
An assessment of risk understanding in Hispanic genetic counseling patients.
J Genet Couns. 2005 Aug;14(4):319-28. doi: 10.1007/s10897-005-0759-5.
7
Strategies to help patients understand risks.帮助患者理解风险的策略。
BMJ. 2003 Sep 27;327(7417):745-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7417.745.