Suppr超能文献

血管异常与气管食管压迫:一家机构的25年经验

Vascular anomalies and tracheoesophageal compression: a single institution's 25-year experience.

作者信息

Woods R K, Sharp R J, Holcomb G W, Snyder C L, Lofland G K, Ashcraft K W, Holder T M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Children's Mercy Hospital, University Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, 64108, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Aug;72(2):434-8; discussion 438-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02806-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vascular rings are uncommon anomalies in which preferred strategies for diagnosis and treatment may vary among institutions. In this report, we offer a description of our approach and a review of our 25-year experience.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all pediatric patients with symptomatic tracheoesophageal compression secondary to anomalies of the aortic arch and great vessels diagnosed from 1974 to 2000.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (38%) of eighty-two patients (mean age, 1.7 years), were identified with double aortic arch, 22 patients (27%) with right arch left ligamentum, and 20 patients (24%) with innominate artery compression. Our diagnostic approach emphasized barium esophagram, along with echocardiography. This regimen was found to be reliable for all cases except those with innominate artery compression for which bronchoscopy was preferred, and except those with pulmonary artery sling for which computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, in addition to bronchoscopy, were preferred. Left thoracotomy was the most common operative approach (70 of 82; 85%). Ten patients (12%) had associated heart anomalies, and 6 (7%) patients underwent repair. Complications occurred in 9 (11%) patients and led to death in 3 (4%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In our practice, barium swallow and echocardiography are sufficient in diagnosing and planning the operative strategy in the majority of cases, with notable exceptions. Definitive intraoperative delineation of arch anatomy minimizes the risk of misdiagnosis or inadequate treatment.

摘要

背景

血管环是一种罕见的异常情况,各机构对于其诊断和治疗的首选策略可能有所不同。在本报告中,我们描述了我们的治疗方法,并回顾了我们25年的经验。

方法

对1974年至2000年期间诊断为主动脉弓和大血管异常继发有症状性气管食管受压的所有儿科患者进行了回顾性研究。

结果

82例患者(平均年龄1.7岁)中,31例(38%)被诊断为双主动脉弓,22例(27%)为右位主动脉弓左韧带,20例(24%)为无名动脉受压。我们的诊断方法重点是钡剂食管造影以及超声心动图。除了无名动脉受压(首选支气管镜检查)和肺动脉吊带(除支气管镜检查外,首选计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像)的病例外,该方案被发现对所有病例都可靠。左胸切开术是最常见的手术方法(82例中的70例;85%)。10例患者(12%)伴有心脏异常,6例(7%)患者接受了修复手术。9例(11%)患者出现并发症,3例(4%)患者死亡。

结论

在我们的实践中,大多数情况下,吞钡检查和超声心动图足以用于诊断和制定手术策略,但有明显例外。术中明确界定主动脉弓解剖结构可将误诊或治疗不足的风险降至最低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验