Hurt G J, McQuellon R P, Michielutte R, Conrad D M, Carter S, Anderson H
Cancer Patient Support Program, Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001 Aug;28(7):1097-104.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To measure psychological distress and test the feasibility of a psychological intervention to reduce distress in patients undergoing risk assessment.
Descriptive.
A comprehensive cancer center located in the southeastern United States.
20 first-degree relatives of women diagnosed with breast cancer (X age = 42; range = 21-70) completed the risk assessment process. Three were lost to follow-up at three months, leaving a total of 17 evaluable patients.
Data collection was by means of family/medical history forms and questionnaires administered at baseline and one and three months. Participants were randomized to either a control group consisting of standard education about risk for breast cancer or to an intervention group consisting of standard education plus a psychological intervention designed to teach stress-management skills.
Psychological distress, depressive symptoms, intrusive thoughts about breast cancer, and perceived risk for developing breast cancer.
Delivery of a psychological intervention proved feasible. Although no statistically significant differences existed between the intervention and control groups on distress and depressive symptoms, the intervention group reported fewer intrusive thoughts about breast cancer at follow-up. Risk did not predict anxiety levels. A large majority (73%) of the women overestimated the risk of breast cancer at baseline.
This study demonstrated the feasibility of a multidisciplinary team approach to breast cancer risk assessment and counseling and management of psychological distress in first-degree relatives of women with breast cancer. The data suggest that a psychological intervention may reduce cancer-specific psychological distress in women at increased risk for breast cancer.
Oncology nurses can play an important role in the delivery of interventions to educate and reduce distress in women undergoing breast cancer risk assessment.
目的/目标:测量心理困扰程度,并测试一项心理干预措施在接受风险评估的患者中减轻困扰的可行性。
描述性研究。
位于美国东南部的一家综合癌症中心。
20名被诊断患有乳腺癌女性的一级亲属(平均年龄 = 42岁;范围 = 21 - 70岁)完成了风险评估过程。三个月时有3人失访,最终共有17名可评估患者。
通过家庭/病史表格以及在基线、1个月和3个月时发放的问卷收集数据。参与者被随机分为两组,一组为接受关于乳腺癌风险的标准教育的对照组,另一组为接受标准教育加一项旨在教授压力管理技巧的心理干预措施的干预组。
心理困扰、抑郁症状、关于乳腺癌的侵入性想法以及患乳腺癌的感知风险。
事实证明心理干预措施可行。虽然干预组和对照组在困扰和抑郁症状方面没有统计学上的显著差异,但干预组在随访时报告的关于乳腺癌的侵入性想法较少。风险并不能预测焦虑水平。绝大多数(73%)女性在基线时高估了患乳腺癌的风险。
本研究证明了多学科团队方法用于乳腺癌风险评估以及为乳腺癌女性一级亲属提供心理困扰咨询和管理的可行性。数据表明,心理干预可能会减轻乳腺癌风险增加女性的特定癌症心理困扰。
肿瘤护士在为接受乳腺癌风险评估的女性提供教育和减轻困扰的干预措施方面可以发挥重要作用。