Revicki D A
MEDTAP International, Inc., Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Schizophr Res. 1999 Mar 1;35 Suppl:S101-9. doi: 10.1016/s0920-9964(98)00168-6.
The pharmacoeconomic evaluation of atypical antipsychotics for patients with schizophrenia requires focus on both clinical and quality of life effects and impact on the cost of medical resources. The results of pharmacoeconomic studies help clinicians and health care decision makers identify treatments that provide the most benefit to patients at the most acceptable cost. The cost-effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs has been evaluated using noncontrolled, mirrorimage (i.e. retrospective/prospective) cohort study designs; clinical decision analysis models; and randomized clinical trials. The current pharmacoeconomic evidence suggests that clozapine is a cost-effective therapy for neuroleptic-refractory schizophrenia and that although olanzapine and risperidone therapy may be cost neutral, they improve outcome in patients treated for schizophrenia.
对精神分裂症患者使用非典型抗精神病药物进行药物经济学评估,需要关注临床疗效、生活质量影响以及对医疗资源成本的影响。药物经济学研究结果有助于临床医生和医疗保健决策者确定能以最可接受的成本为患者带来最大益处的治疗方法。已使用非对照、镜像(即回顾性/前瞻性)队列研究设计、临床决策分析模型和随机临床试验来评估抗精神病药物的成本效益。目前的药物经济学证据表明,氯氮平是治疗对神经阻滞剂难治的精神分裂症的一种具有成本效益的疗法,并且尽管奥氮平和利培酮治疗可能成本相当,但它们可改善精神分裂症患者的治疗结果。