Suppr超能文献

精神分裂症的疗效评估:非典型抗精神病药物之间的差异。临床试验评估协作工作组。

Measuring outcome in schizophrenia: differences among the atypical antipsychotics. Collaborative Working Group on Clinical Trial Evaluations.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 12:3-9.

PMID:9766613
Abstract

The advent of the atypical antipsychotics marked a new era in the history of the treatment of psychotic disorders. To evaluate the published literature about the available atypical antipsychotics--clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine--and select the most appropriate treatment for specific patients, physicians need to understand the outcome measures used in clinical studies, the pharmacologic differences that explain varying side effect profiles, and pharmacoeconomic assessments that are used in the decision-making process. While the atypical antipsychotics have established efficacy in the overall treatment of schizophrenia, they may differ in their effects on factors such as cognitive function, overall quality of life, adverse events, and hospitalization status. Each of these factors should be considered when weighing treatment options for an individual patient.

摘要

非典型抗精神病药物的出现标志着精神病性障碍治疗史上的一个新时代。为了评估已发表的关于现有非典型抗精神病药物——氯氮平、利培酮、奥氮平和喹硫平——的文献,并为特定患者选择最合适的治疗方法,医生需要了解临床研究中使用的疗效指标、解释不同副作用特征的药理学差异以及决策过程中使用的药物经济学评估。虽然非典型抗精神病药物在精神分裂症的整体治疗中已确立了疗效,但它们在对认知功能、总体生活质量、不良事件和住院状况等因素的影响方面可能存在差异。在为个体患者权衡治疗方案时,应考虑这些因素中的每一个。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验