Marquez M A, Melton L J, Muhs J M, Crowson C S, Tosomeen A, O'Connor M K, O'Fallon W M, Riggs B L
Office of Diversity in Clinical Research, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(7):595-604. doi: 10.1007/s001980170083.
The epidemiology of bone loss in populations of Asian heritage is still poorly known. This study compared the skeletal status of a convenience sample of 396 Southeast Asian immigrants (172 Vietnamese, 171 Cambodians and 53 Laotians) residing in Rochester, Minnesota in 1997 with 684 white subjects previously recruited from an age-stratified random sample of community residents. Areal bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2) and volumetric bone mineral apparent density (BMAD, g/cm3) were determined for lumbar spine and proximal femur using the Hologic QDR 2000 instrument for the white population and the QDR 4500 for Southeast Asian subjects; the machines were cross-calibrated from data on 20 volunteers. Lumbar spine BMD was 7% higher in white than Southeast Asian women (p < 0.001), and similar results were observed for the femoral neck; lumbar spine BMD was 12% higher in white than nonwhite men (p < 0.001). Race-specific discrepancies were reduced by calculating BMAD: for premenopausal women, lumbar spine and femoral neck differences between whites and Southeast Asians were eliminated; for postmenopausal women the lumbar spine differences persisted (p < 0.0001), while femoral neck BMAD was actually higher for Southeast Asians. There were no race-specific differences in femoral neck BMAD among men of any age (p = 0.312), but lumbar spine BMAD was less for younger (p = 0.042) but not older (p = 0.693) Southeast Asian men. There were differences among the Southeast Asian subgroups, but no clear pattern emerged. Predictors of lumbar spine BMAD in Southeast Asian women were age (p < 0.001), weight (p = 0.015) and gravidity (p = 0.037). Even after adjusting for bone size using BMAD, 32% and 9% of Southeast Asian women and men, respectively, would be considered to have osteoporosis at the femoral neck and 25% and 4%, respectively, at the lumbar spine. These findings indicate a need for culturally sensitive educational interventions for Southeast Asians and for physicians to pursue diagnosis and treatment to prevent osteoporosis-related disabilities in this population.
亚洲裔人群骨质流失的流行病学情况仍鲜为人知。本研究比较了1997年居住在明尼苏达州罗切斯特市的396名东南亚移民(172名越南人、171名柬埔寨人和53名老挝人)的便利样本与先前从社区居民年龄分层随机样本中招募的684名白人受试者的骨骼状况。使用Hologic QDR 2000仪器为白人测定腰椎和股骨近端的面积骨密度(BMD,g/cm²)和体积骨矿物质表观密度(BMAD,g/cm³),为东南亚受试者使用QDR 4500仪器;两台机器根据20名志愿者的数据进行了交叉校准。白人女性的腰椎BMD比东南亚女性高7%(p < 0.001),股骨颈也观察到类似结果;白人男性的腰椎BMD比非白人男性高12%(p < 0.001)。通过计算BMAD减少了种族特异性差异:对于绝经前女性,白人和东南亚人在腰椎和股骨颈的差异消除;对于绝经后女性,腰椎差异仍然存在(p < 0.0001),而东南亚女性的股骨颈BMAD实际上更高。各年龄段男性的股骨颈BMAD没有种族特异性差异(p = 0.312),但年轻的东南亚男性腰椎BMAD较低(p = 0.042),年长的则没有差异(p = 0.693)。东南亚亚组之间存在差异,但没有出现明确的模式。东南亚女性腰椎BMAD的预测因素是年龄(p < 0.001)、体重(p = 0.015)和妊娠次数(p = 0.037)。即使使用BMAD对骨大小进行校正后,分别仍有32%的东南亚女性和9%的东南亚男性在股骨颈被认为患有骨质疏松症,在腰椎分别为25%和4%。这些发现表明需要针对东南亚人开展具有文化敏感性的教育干预措施,并且医生需要进行诊断和治疗,以预防该人群中与骨质疏松症相关的残疾。