Suppr超能文献

越南男性和女性的骨密度参考范围和骨质疏松症患病率。

Reference ranges for bone mineral density and prevalence of osteoporosis in Vietnamese men and women.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, 86/2 Thanh Thai Street, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Aug 10;12:182. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-182.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of different reference ranges in bone mineral density on the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study involved 357 men and 870 women aged between 18 and 89 years, who were randomly sampled from various districts within Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. BMD at the femoral neck, lumbar spine and whole body was measured by DXA (Hologic QDR4500). Polynomial regression models and bootstraps method were used to determine peak BMD and standard deviation (SD). Based on the two parameters, we computed T-scores (denoted by TVN) for each individual in the study. A similar diagnosis was also done based on T-scores provided by the densitometer (TDXA), which is based on the US White population (NHANES III). We then compared the concordance between TVN and TDXA in the classification of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis was defined according to the World Health Organization criteria.

RESULTS

In post-menopausal women, the prevalence of osteoporosis based on femoral neck TVN was 29%, but when the diagnosis was based on TDXA, the prevalence was 44%. In men aged 50+ years, the TVN-based prevalence of osteoporosis was 10%, which was lower than TDXA-based prevalence (30%). Among 177 women who were diagnosed with osteoporosis by TDXA, 35% were actually osteopenia by TVN. The kappa-statistic was 0.54 for women and 0.41 for men.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that the T-scores provided by the Hologic QDR4500 over-diagnosed osteoporosis in Vietnamese men and women. This over-diagnosis could lead to over-treatment and influence the decision of recruitment of participants in clinical trials.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨不同骨密度参考范围对骨质疏松症诊断的影响。

方法

这是一项横断面研究,共纳入 357 名 18-89 岁男性和 870 名女性,他们来自越南胡志明市的不同地区。采用 DXA(Hologic QDR4500)测量股骨颈、腰椎和全身的骨密度。采用多项式回归模型和自举法确定峰值骨密度和标准差。基于这两个参数,我们为研究中的每位个体计算 T 评分(用 TVN 表示)。还根据密度计(TDXA)提供的 T 评分(基于美国白人人群,NHANES III)进行了类似的诊断。然后,我们比较了 TVN 和 TDXA 在骨质疏松症分类中的一致性。骨质疏松症根据世界卫生组织标准定义。

结果

在绝经后女性中,基于股骨颈 TVN 的骨质疏松症患病率为 29%,但基于 TDXA 的诊断时,患病率为 44%。在 50 岁以上的男性中,基于 TVN 的骨质疏松症患病率为 10%,低于基于 TDXA 的患病率(30%)。在 177 名被 TDXA 诊断为骨质疏松症的女性中,35%实际上是 TVN 诊断的骨量减少。女性的 Kappa 统计量为 0.54,男性为 0.41。

结论

这些数据表明,Hologic QDR4500 提供的 T 评分过度诊断了越南男性和女性的骨质疏松症。这种过度诊断可能导致过度治疗,并影响临床试验参与者的招募决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc3/3163638/504bc5ffa974/1471-2474-12-182-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验