Williams J G, Cheung W Y, Chetwynd N, Cohen D R, El-Sharkawi S, Finlay I, Lervy B, Longo M, Malinovszky K
School of Postgraduate Studies in Medical & Health Care, University of Wales, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10(3):159-65. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100159...
To evaluate the use of a multidisciplinary record held by patients with cancer in the community.
Pragmatic randomised controlled trial.
The environs of Swansea in south west Wales.
501 patients under the care of the Department of Oncology, Singleton Hospital, Swansea.
A patient held record used by the patient and healthcare professionals. Main outcome measures-Health related quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) measured at entry into the study and at 6 months; patients' views at 6 months; healthcare professionals' views collected after the completion of patient follow up; NHS resource and booklet use.
1148 patients were eligible for the study; 501 were recruited (44%) and 344 completed the study (172 in each group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in change in quality of life or NHS resource use. The patient held record did not have an impact on communication but was significantly helpful to patients in preparing for appointments, reducing difficulties in monitoring their own progress, and helping them to feel more in control (p<0.05). Fifty three percent of patients would have preferred not to have a patient held record. There was a low level of use of the record by healthcare professionals but most of those who remembered using it indicated that they would prefer patients to have it.
The patient held record is valued by some patients and professionals but has no significant impact on the quality of life of patients or NHS resource use. It has a positive impact on quality by helping patients feel more in control and prepare for meetings with healthcare staff. Patients who find it useful tend to be younger and have more professionals involved in their care. It is recommended that it should be made available to patients on request and used by them according to need.
评估社区癌症患者持有的多学科记录的使用情况。
实用随机对照试验。
威尔士西南部斯旺西周边地区。
斯旺西市辛格尔顿医院肿瘤科护理下的501名患者。
患者和医疗保健专业人员使用的患者记录。主要结局指标——在研究开始时和6个月时测量的健康相关生活质量(欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C30);6个月时患者的意见;患者随访完成后收集的医疗保健专业人员的意见;国民保健服务资源和手册使用情况。
1148名患者符合研究条件;招募了501名(44%),344名完成了研究(每组172名)。两组在生活质量变化或国民保健服务资源使用方面无显著差异。患者记录对沟通没有影响,但对患者准备预约、减少监测自身进展的困难以及帮助他们感觉更能掌控局面有显著帮助(p<0.05)。53%的患者宁愿没有患者记录。医疗保健专业人员对记录的使用水平较低,但大多数记得使用过的人表示他们希望患者拥有它。
患者记录受到一些患者和专业人员的重视,但对患者的生活质量或国民保健服务资源使用没有显著影响。它通过帮助患者感觉更能掌控局面并为与医护人员的会面做准备,对质量有积极影响。认为它有用的患者往往更年轻且有更多专业人员参与其护理。建议应根据患者要求提供记录,并由患者根据需要使用。