• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解患者的治疗偏好:对创新方法的需求。

Understanding patients' preferences for treatment: the need for innovative methodologies.

作者信息

Frewer L J, Salter B, Lambert N

机构信息

Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UA, UK.

出版信息

Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i50-4. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100050...

DOI:10.1136/qhc.0100050..
PMID:11533439
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1765738/
Abstract

Treatment selection is now much more consumer driven than in the past. However, there is a need to develop investigative methodological approaches that are sensitive to differences in patient preferences if full account is to be taken of what the patient sees as the best option in terms of different possible treatments available for a particular condition. Previous attitude research has been criticised because it does not provide insight into reasons why people hold different preferences or beliefs. A methodology is described which allows people to describe their concerns and values associated with different treatment options in their own words. This is the repertory grid method of eliciting personal constructs used in conjunction with generalised Procrustes analysis (GPA). An example of the use of this methodology is provided, drawn from research directed towards understanding people's beliefs about genetic technologies. A possible application of the method to understanding treatment preferences related to type 2 diabetes is also discussed. It is concluded that the use of innovative methodologies is essential if our understanding of patient preferences regarding treatment options is to have a significant impact on patient quality of life.

摘要

与过去相比,现在的治疗选择更多地由消费者驱动。然而,如果要全面考虑患者在特定病症的不同可用治疗方法中认为的最佳选择,就需要开发对患者偏好差异敏感的调查方法。以前的态度研究受到批评,因为它没有深入了解人们持有不同偏好或信念的原因。本文描述了一种方法,该方法允许人们用自己的语言描述与不同治疗选择相关的担忧和价值观。这就是用于结合广义普罗克汝斯分析(GPA)引出个人构念的 repertory 网格法。文中提供了一个使用该方法的例子,该例子取自旨在理解人们对基因技术信念的研究。还讨论了该方法在理解与 2 型糖尿病相关的治疗偏好方面的可能应用。得出的结论是,如果我们对患者治疗选择偏好的理解要对患者生活质量产生重大影响,那么使用创新方法至关重要。

相似文献

1
Understanding patients' preferences for treatment: the need for innovative methodologies.了解患者的治疗偏好:对创新方法的需求。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i50-4. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100050...
2
Assessing patients' preferences for treatments for angina using a modified repertory grid method.使用改良的 repertory 网格法评估患者对心绞痛治疗方法的偏好。
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jun;60(11):2585-95. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.10.019. Epub 2004 Dec 15.
3
Suffering in deference: a focus group study of older cardiac patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk.顺从中的痛苦:一项关于老年心脏病患者治疗偏好和风险认知的焦点小组研究
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i23-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100023...
4
Can patients' preferences for involvement in decision-making regarding the use of medicines be predicted?能否预测患者在药物使用决策中参与度的偏好?
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Jun;66(3):361-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.01.012. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
5
Preferences for medical collaboration: patient-physician congruence and patient outcomes.医疗协作偏好:医患一致性与患者治疗结果
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jun;57(3):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.08.006.
6
Older people's reasoning for resuscitation preferences and their role in the decision-making process.老年人对复苏偏好的理由及其在决策过程中的作用。
Resuscitation. 2005 May;65(2):165-71. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.11.016. Epub 2005 Jan 26.
7
Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk.衡量患者对治疗的偏好和对风险的认知。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i2-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100002...
8
Information and participation in decision-making about treatment: a qualitative study of the perceptions and preferences of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.治疗相关信息及参与决策:一项关于类风湿关节炎患者认知与偏好的定性研究
J Med Ethics. 2008 Nov;34(11):775-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.023705.
9
The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments.患者对治疗风险的理解程度。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i14-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100014...
10
Health beliefs and expectations implicit in decision-making in a Hong Kong Chinese surgical population.香港华裔外科手术人群决策中隐含的健康信念和期望。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Mar;16(3):603-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01572.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Using discrete choice experiments to develop and deliver patient-centered psychological interventions: a systematic review.使用离散选择实验开发和提供以患者为中心的心理干预措施:系统评价。
Health Psychol Rev. 2021 Jun;15(2):314-332. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1715813. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
2
How can qualitative research be utilised in the NHS when re-designing and commissioning services?在重新设计和委托提供医疗服务时,如何在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中运用定性研究?
Br J Pain. 2015 Feb;9(1):70-2. doi: 10.1177/2049463714544553.
3
Exploring the beliefs of heart failure patients towards their heart failure medicines and self care activities.探讨心力衰竭患者对心力衰竭药物和自我护理活动的信念。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2012 Aug;34(4):618-25. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9655-x. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
4
Too complex and time-consuming to fit in! Physicians' experiences of elderly patients and their participation in medical decision making: a grounded theory study.过于复杂且耗时难以适应!医生对老年患者的经历及其参与医疗决策的情况:一项扎根理论研究。
BMJ Open. 2012 May 31;2(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001063. Print 2012.
5
Are elderly people with co-morbidities involved adequately in medical decision making when hospitalised? A cross-sectional survey.当老年人因合并症住院时,他们是否充分参与了医疗决策?一项横断面调查。
BMC Geriatr. 2011 Aug 18;11:46. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-11-46.
6
General practitioners' perceptions of the effectiveness of medical interventions: an exploration of underlying constructs.全科医生对医疗干预措施有效性的看法:对潜在结构的探索。
Implement Sci. 2010 Feb 16;5:17. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-17.
7
Older home-care patients' preferred approaches to depression care: a pilot study.老年居家护理患者对抑郁症护理的偏好方法:一项试点研究。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2008 Aug;34(8):17-22. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20080801-06.
8
Ascertaining consumer perspectives of medication information sources using a modified repertory grid technique.使用改良的 repertory 网格技术确定消费者对药物信息来源的看法。
Pharm World Sci. 2007 Apr;29(2):73-80. doi: 10.1007/s11096-006-9076-9. Epub 2006 Dec 23.
9
The risks of eating and drinking.饮食的风险。
EMBO Rep. 2004 Oct;5 Spec No(Suppl 1):S27-31. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400225.
10
Reasons underpinning patients' preferences for various angina treatments.患者对各种心绞痛治疗方法偏好的潜在原因。
Health Expect. 2004 Sep;7(3):246-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00282.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Public concerns in the United Kingdom about general and specific applications of genetic engineering: risk, benefit, and ethics.英国公众对基因工程的一般应用和特定应用的关注:风险、益处与伦理。
Sci Technol Human Values. 1997 Winter;22(1):98-124. doi: 10.1177/016224399702200105.
2
Use of discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences.使用离散选择实验来引出偏好。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i55-60. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100055...
3
How do patients' treatment preferences compare with those of clinicians?患者的治疗偏好与临床医生的相比如何?
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i39-43. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100039...
4
Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools.患者参与医疗决策偏好的变异性:对决策支持工具使用的启示
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i34-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100034...
5
Importance of risk communication and decision making in cardiovascular conditions in older patients: a discussion paper.老年患者心血管疾病中风险沟通与决策的重要性:一篇讨论文章。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i19-22. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100019...
6
The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments.患者对治疗风险的理解程度。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i14-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100014...
7
Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences.理解风险以及关于治疗偏好的临床风险沟通的经验教训。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i9-13. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100009...
8
Recommendations of dietitians for overcoming barriers to dietary adherence in individuals with diabetes.
Diabetes Educ. 2000 Mar-Apr;26(2):272-9. doi: 10.1177/014572170002600207.
9
New strategies for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病的治疗新策略。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1999 Mar;99(3):329-34. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(99)00083-8.
10
Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management.运用联合分析评估女性对流产管理的偏好。
Health Econ. 1997 May-Jun;6(3):261-73. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199705)6:3<261::aid-hec262>3.0.co;2-n.