Frewer L J, Salter B, Lambert N
Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UA, UK.
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i50-4. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100050...
Treatment selection is now much more consumer driven than in the past. However, there is a need to develop investigative methodological approaches that are sensitive to differences in patient preferences if full account is to be taken of what the patient sees as the best option in terms of different possible treatments available for a particular condition. Previous attitude research has been criticised because it does not provide insight into reasons why people hold different preferences or beliefs. A methodology is described which allows people to describe their concerns and values associated with different treatment options in their own words. This is the repertory grid method of eliciting personal constructs used in conjunction with generalised Procrustes analysis (GPA). An example of the use of this methodology is provided, drawn from research directed towards understanding people's beliefs about genetic technologies. A possible application of the method to understanding treatment preferences related to type 2 diabetes is also discussed. It is concluded that the use of innovative methodologies is essential if our understanding of patient preferences regarding treatment options is to have a significant impact on patient quality of life.
与过去相比,现在的治疗选择更多地由消费者驱动。然而,如果要全面考虑患者在特定病症的不同可用治疗方法中认为的最佳选择,就需要开发对患者偏好差异敏感的调查方法。以前的态度研究受到批评,因为它没有深入了解人们持有不同偏好或信念的原因。本文描述了一种方法,该方法允许人们用自己的语言描述与不同治疗选择相关的担忧和价值观。这就是用于结合广义普罗克汝斯分析(GPA)引出个人构念的 repertory 网格法。文中提供了一个使用该方法的例子,该例子取自旨在理解人们对基因技术信念的研究。还讨论了该方法在理解与 2 型糖尿病相关的治疗偏好方面的可能应用。得出的结论是,如果我们对患者治疗选择偏好的理解要对患者生活质量产生重大影响,那么使用创新方法至关重要。