Vitkovitch M, Rutter C, Read A
Department of Psychology, University of East London, UK.
Br J Psychol. 2001 Aug;92(Pt 3):483-506.
Three picture naming experiments are reported which examine the relationship between the apparent inhibition of a response on one trial, and naming latency on the subsequent trial. The design of each experiment involves the presentation of prime and target pairs, either presented in succession (Lag 1 condition), or separated by two intervening unrelated trials (Lag 3 condition). A control condition is also included. In Experiment 1, a speeded picture naming task is used, and naming errors are analysed. Target pictures are misnamed at above chance rates with the name of the semantically related prime picture in the Lag 3 condition. In contrast, these prime-related errors do not occur in the Lag 1 condition, suggesting a brief inhibitory effect. If primes are briefly inhibited, then target naming latencies immediately following a related prime should be quicker than target latencies in the Lag 3 condition. Experiment 2 confirms this pattern of results, using exactly the same stimuli and design, but standard naming instructions. Experiment 3 examines whether the inferred inhibition is the result of a self-inhibitory mechanism, using a repetition priming paradigm. If Lag 1 prime representations are self-inhibited, then facilitatory effects from prime/target repetition should be stronger in the Lag 3 condition, than in the Lag 1 condition. The data from Expt 3 were not consistent with this prediction. Taken together, the results of the three experiments suggest that a brief inhibitory effect occurs after retrieval of an object name, and that the inhibition may be accomplished by mechanisms other than self-inhibition.
本文报告了三项图片命名实验,这些实验研究了一次试验中反应的明显抑制与后续试验中命名潜伏期之间的关系。每个实验的设计都包括启动刺激和目标刺激对的呈现,它们要么连续呈现(间隔1条件),要么被两个中间无关试验隔开(间隔3条件)。还包括一个对照条件。在实验1中,使用了快速图片命名任务,并对命名错误进行了分析。在间隔3条件下,目标图片被错误地用语义相关的启动图片的名称命名,错误率高于随机水平。相比之下,这些与启动刺激相关的错误在间隔1条件下不会出现,这表明存在短暂的抑制作用。如果启动刺激被短暂抑制,那么在相关启动刺激之后立即进行的目标命名潜伏期应该比间隔3条件下的目标潜伏期更快。实验2使用完全相同的刺激和设计,但采用标准命名指导,证实了这一结果模式。实验3使用重复启动范式,研究了推断出的抑制是否是自我抑制机制的结果。如果间隔1的启动刺激表征被自我抑制,那么启动刺激/目标重复的促进作用在间隔3条件下应该比在间隔1条件下更强。实验3的数据与这一预测不一致。综合来看,这三项实验的结果表明,在检索物体名称后会出现短暂的抑制作用,并且这种抑制可能是由自我抑制以外的机制完成的。