• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于血流测量的磁共振相速度映射精度评估。

Evaluation of the precision of magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping for blood flow measurements.

作者信息

Chatzimavroudis G P, Oshinski J N, Franch R H, Walker P G, Yoganathan A P, Pettigrew R I

机构信息

Department of Chemical Engineering, Cleveland State University, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2001;3(1):11-9. doi: 10.1081/jcmr-100000142.

DOI:10.1081/jcmr-100000142
PMID:11545135
Abstract

Evaluating the in vivo accuracy of magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping (PVM) is not straightforward because of the absence of a validated clinical flow quantification technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate PVM by investigating its precision, both in vitro and in vivo, in a 1.5 Tesla scanner. In the former case, steady and pulsatile flow experiments were conducted using an aortic model under a variety of flow conditions (steady: 0.1-5.5 L/min; pulsatile: 10-75 mL/cycle). In the latter case, PVM measurements were taken in the ascending aorta of ten subjects, seven of which had aortic regurgitation. Each velocity measurement was taken twice, with the slice perpendicular to the long axis of the aorta. Comparison between the measured and true flow rates and volumes confirmed the high accuracy of PVM in measuring flow in vitro (p > 0.85). The in vitro precision of PVM was found to be very high(steady: y = 1.00x + 0.02, r = 0.999; pulsatile: y = 0.98x + 0.72, r = 0.997; x: measurement #1, y: measurement #2) and this was confirmed by Bland-Altman analysis. Of great clinical significance was the high level of the in vivo precision (y = 1.01x - 0.04, r = 0.993), confirmed statistically (p = 1.00). In conclusion, PVM provides repeatable blood flow measurements. The high in vitro accuracy and precision, combined with the high in vivo precision, are key factors for the establishment of PVM as the "gold-standard" to quantify blood flow.

摘要

由于缺乏经过验证的临床血流定量技术,评估磁共振相速度映射(PVM)的体内准确性并非易事。本研究的目的是通过在1.5特斯拉扫描仪中研究其体外和体内的精度来评估PVM。在前一种情况下,使用主动脉模型在各种血流条件下进行稳定和搏动血流实验(稳定:0.1 - 5.5升/分钟;搏动:10 - 75毫升/周期)。在后一种情况下,对10名受试者的升主动脉进行PVM测量,其中7名患有主动脉瓣反流。每次速度测量进行两次,切片垂直于主动脉的长轴。测量的和真实的流速及流量之间的比较证实了PVM在体外测量血流方面的高精度(p > 0.85)。发现PVM的体外精度非常高(稳定:y = 1.00x + 0.02,r = 0.999;搏动:y = 0.98x + 0.72,r = 0.997;x:测量值#1,y:测量值#2),这通过布兰德 - 奥特曼分析得到了证实。具有重大临床意义的是体内精度水平很高(y = 1.01x - 0.04,r = 0.993),经统计学证实(p = 1.00)。总之,PVM提供了可重复的血流测量。高体外准确性和精度,再加上高体内精度,是将PVM确立为血流定量“金标准”的关键因素。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the precision of magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping for blood flow measurements.用于血流测量的磁共振相速度映射精度评估。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2001;3(1):11-9. doi: 10.1081/jcmr-100000142.
2
Slice location dependence of aortic regurgitation measurements with MR phase velocity mapping.
Magn Reson Med. 1997 Apr;37(4):545-51. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910370412.
3
Ultrafast flow quantification with segmented k-space magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping.
Ann Biomed Eng. 2002 Jan;30(1):120-8. doi: 10.1114/1.1433489.
4
The importance of slice location on the accuracy of aortic regurgitation measurements with magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping.切片位置对磁共振相速度映射测量主动脉瓣反流准确性的重要性。
Ann Biomed Eng. 1997 Jul-Aug;25(4):644-52. doi: 10.1007/BF02684842.
5
Quantification of the aortic regurgitant volume with magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping: a clinical investigation of the importance of imaging slice location.
J Heart Valve Dis. 1998 Jan;7(1):94-101.
6
In vitro assessment of heart valve bioprostheses by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: four-dimensional mapping of flow patterns and orifice area planimetry.心血管磁共振对心脏瓣膜生物假体的体外评估:血流模式的四维图和瓣口面积平面测量。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Sep;40(3):736-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.12.040. Epub 2011 Feb 20.
7
Time-resolved 3-dimensional velocity mapping in the thoracic aorta: visualization of 3-directional blood flow patterns in healthy volunteers and patients.胸主动脉的时间分辨三维速度映射:健康志愿者和患者三维血流模式的可视化
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004 Jul-Aug;28(4):459-68. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200407000-00005.
8
Fast measurements of flow through mitral regurgitant orifices with magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping.
Ann Biomed Eng. 2004 Dec;32(12):1618-27. doi: 10.1007/s10439-004-7815-4.
9
Phase-velocity cine magnetic resonance imaging measurement of pulsatile blood flow in children and young adults: in vitro and in vivo validation.儿童和青年成人搏动性血流的相速度电影磁共振成像测量:体外和体内验证
Pediatr Cardiol. 2000 Mar-Apr;21(2):104-10. doi: 10.1007/s002469910014.
10
Flow quantitation with echo-planar phase-contrast velocity mapping: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1995 Nov-Dec;5(6):656-62. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880050607.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and valvular heart diseases: a suggested protocol for congenital lesions.心血管磁共振成像与心脏瓣膜病:先天性病变的建议方案
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2025 Apr 30;15(2):441-454. doi: 10.21037/cdt-24-470. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
2
Superiority of a Representative MRI Flow Waveform over Doppler Ultrasound for Aortic Wave Reflection Assessment in Children and Adolescents With/Without a History of Heart Disease.代表性 MRI 血流波形优于多普勒超声用于评估有/无心血管病史的儿童和青少年的主动脉波反射。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2023 Dec;51(12):2772-2784. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03339-2. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
3
A clinician's guide to understanding aortic 4D flow MRI.
临床医生理解主动脉四维血流磁共振成像指南
Insights Imaging. 2023 Jul 3;14(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01458-x.
4
Optimization of 4D Flow MRI Spatial and Temporal Resolution for Examining Complex Hemodynamics in the Carotid Artery Bifurcation.优化 4D 流 MRI 的空间和时间分辨率,以检查颈动脉分叉处的复杂血液动力学。
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2023 Jun;14(3):476-488. doi: 10.1007/s13239-023-00667-1. Epub 2023 May 8.
5
Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Native Valvular Regurgitation: A Comprehensive Review of Protocols, Grading of Severity, and Prediction of Valve Surgery.心血管磁共振在原发性瓣膜反流中的作用:协议、严重程度分级及瓣膜手术预测的综合综述
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 7;9:881141. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.881141. eCollection 2022.
6
Imaging assessment of mitral and aortic regurgitation: current state of the art.二尖瓣和主动脉瓣反流的影像学评估:当前技术水平
Heart. 2020 Nov;106(22):1769-1776. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316216. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
7
Functional assessment of bioprosthetic mitral valves by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: An in vitro validation and comparison to Doppler echocardiography.经心血管磁共振对生物二尖瓣瓣膜功能的评估:体外验证并与多普勒超声心动图比较。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Jul 30;22(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00635-x.
8
Quantification of Cardiac Output with Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension.磁共振相位对比成像对肺动脉高压患者心输出量的定量分析
J Clin Imaging Sci. 2020 May 2;10:26. doi: 10.25259/JCIS_36_2020. eCollection 2020.
9
Randomised comparison of a balloon-expandable and self-expandable valve with quantitative assessment of aortic regurgitation using magnetic resonance imaging.使用磁共振成像对球囊扩张瓣膜和自膨胀瓣膜进行随机比较并对主动脉瓣反流进行定量评估。
Neth Heart J. 2020 May;28(5):253-265. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01414-0.
10
Clinical assessment of aortic valve stenosis: Comparison between 4D flow MRI and transthoracic echocardiography.主动脉瓣狭窄的临床评估:4D 流动磁共振成像与经胸超声心动图的比较
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Feb;51(2):472-480. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26847. Epub 2019 Jun 30.