• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超级星:基于CSD和PDB的相互作用场比较作为预测蛋白质-配体相互作用的基础。

SuperStar: comparison of CSD and PDB-based interaction fields as a basis for the prediction of protein-ligand interactions.

作者信息

Boer D R, Kroon J, Cole J C, Smith B, Verdonk M L

机构信息

Department of Crystal & Structural Chemistry, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Mol Biol. 2001 Sep 7;312(1):275-87. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4901.

DOI:10.1006/jmbi.2001.4901
PMID:11545602
Abstract

SuperStar is an empirical method for identifying interaction sites in proteins, based entirely on the experimental information about non-bonded interactions, present in the IsoStar database. The interaction information in IsoStar is contained in scatterplots, which show the distribution of a chosen probe around structure fragments. SuperStar breaks a template molecule (e.g. a protein binding site) into structural fragments which correspond to those in the scatterplots. The scatterplots are then superimposed on the corresponding parts of the template and converted into a composite propensity map. The original version of SuperStar was based entirely on scatterplots from the CSD. Here, scatterplots based on protein-ligand interactions are implemented in SuperStar, and validated on a test set of 122 X-ray structures of protein-ligand complexes. In this validation, propensity maps are compared with the experimentally observed positions of ligand atoms of comparable types. Although non-bonded interaction geometries in small molecule structures are similar to those found in protein-ligand complexes, their relative frequencies of occurrence are different. Polar interactions are more common in the first class of structures, while interactions between hydrophobic groups are more common in protein crystals. In general, PDB and CSD-based SuperStar maps appear equally successful in the prediction of protein-ligand interactions. PDB-based maps are more suitable to identify hydrophobic pockets, and inherently take into account the experimental uncertainties of protein atomic positions. If the protonation state of a histidine, aspartate or glutamate protein side-chain is known, specific CSD-based maps for that protonation state are preferred over PDB-based maps which represent an ensemble of protonation states.

摘要

SuperStar是一种用于识别蛋白质中相互作用位点的经验方法,它完全基于IsoStar数据库中存在的关于非键相互作用的实验信息。IsoStar中的相互作用信息包含在散点图中,这些散点图显示了所选探针围绕结构片段的分布。SuperStar将模板分子(例如蛋白质结合位点)分解为与散点图中相对应的结构片段。然后将散点图叠加到模板的相应部分上,并转换为复合倾向图。SuperStar的原始版本完全基于CSD的散点图。在此,基于蛋白质-配体相互作用的散点图在SuperStar中得以实现,并在一组由122个蛋白质-配体复合物的X射线结构组成的测试集上进行了验证。在该验证中,倾向图与实验观察到的同类配体原子位置进行了比较。尽管小分子结构中的非键相互作用几何形状与蛋白质-配体复合物中的相似,但其相对出现频率不同。极性相互作用在第一类结构中更为常见,而疏水基团之间的相互作用在蛋白质晶体中更为常见。一般来说,基于PDB和CSD的SuperStar图在预测蛋白质-配体相互作用方面似乎同样成功。基于PDB的图更适合识别疏水口袋,并且内在地考虑了蛋白质原子位置的实验不确定性。如果已知组氨酸、天冬氨酸或谷氨酸蛋白质侧链的质子化状态,那么针对该质子化状态的特定基于CSD的图比代表质子化状态集合的基于PDB的图更受青睐。

相似文献

1
SuperStar: comparison of CSD and PDB-based interaction fields as a basis for the prediction of protein-ligand interactions.超级星:基于CSD和PDB的相互作用场比较作为预测蛋白质-配体相互作用的基础。
J Mol Biol. 2001 Sep 7;312(1):275-87. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4901.
2
SuperStar: improved knowledge-based interaction fields for protein binding sites.超级明星:用于蛋白质结合位点的改进的基于知识的相互作用场
J Mol Biol. 2001 Mar 30;307(3):841-59. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4452.
3
SuperStar: a knowledge-based approach for identifying interaction sites in proteins.超级明星:一种基于知识的蛋白质相互作用位点识别方法。
J Mol Biol. 1999 Jun 18;289(4):1093-108. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2809.
4
Domain-based small molecule binding site annotation.基于结构域的小分子结合位点注释。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Mar 17;7:152. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-152.
5
A new test set for validating predictions of protein-ligand interaction.用于验证蛋白质-配体相互作用预测的新测试集。
Proteins. 2002 Dec 1;49(4):457-71. doi: 10.1002/prot.10232.
6
DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction.DrugScore(CSD)——一种基于小分子晶体数据的知识评分函数,对近天然配体构象具有卓越的识别率和更好的亲和力预测能力。
J Med Chem. 2005 Oct 6;48(20):6296-303. doi: 10.1021/jm050436v.
7
PDB-Ligand: a ligand database based on PDB for the automated and customized classification of ligand-binding structures.PDB-配体:一个基于蛋白质数据银行(PDB)的配体数据库,用于配体结合结构的自动和定制分类。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jan 1;33(Database issue):D238-41. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki059.
8
Structural interaction fingerprint (SIFt): a novel method for analyzing three-dimensional protein-ligand binding interactions.结构相互作用指纹图谱(SIFt):一种分析三维蛋白质-配体结合相互作用的新方法。
J Med Chem. 2004 Jan 15;47(2):337-44. doi: 10.1021/jm030331x.
9
The use of composite crystal-field environments in molecular recognition and the de novo design of protein ligands.复合晶体场环境在分子识别及蛋白质配体从头设计中的应用。
J Mol Biol. 1994 Mar 25;237(2):212-35. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1223.
10
Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions.用于预测蛋白质-配体相互作用的基于知识的评分函数。
J Mol Biol. 2000 Jan 14;295(2):337-56. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3371.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-Dimensional CH/π and CH/N Interactions from Quantum-Mechanical and Database Analyses.基于量子力学和数据库分析的三维CH/π和CH/N相互作用
J Chem Inf Model. 2025 Apr 28;65(8):4116-4127. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5c00124. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
2
FitScore: a fast machine learning-based score for 3D virtual screening enrichment.FitScore:一种快速的基于机器学习的 3D 虚拟筛选富集评分方法。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2024 Aug 16;38(1):29. doi: 10.1007/s10822-024-00570-4.
3
Molecular Interaction Fields Describing Halogen Bond Formable Areas on Protein Surfaces.
描述蛋白质表面可形成卤键区域的分子相互作用场
J Chem Inf Model. 2024 Aug 12;64(15):6003-6013. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00896. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
4
Expanding FTMap for Fragment-Based Identification of Pharmacophore Regions in Ligand Binding Sites.扩展 FTMap 以基于片段的方法鉴定配体结合位点中的药效基团区域。
J Chem Inf Model. 2024 Mar 25;64(6):2084-2100. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01969. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
5
Similarities and Differences between Crystal and Enzyme Environmental Effects on the Electron Density of Drug Molecules.晶体和酶对药物分子电子密度的环境效应的异同。
Chemistry. 2021 Feb 15;27(10):3407-3419. doi: 10.1002/chem.202003978. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
6
The use of small-molecule structures to complement protein-ligand crystal structures in drug discovery.在药物发现中使用小分子结构来补充蛋白质-配体晶体结构。
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2017 Mar 1;73(Pt 3):240-245. doi: 10.1107/S2059798317000675. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
7
Using more than 801 296 small-molecule crystal structures to aid in protein structure refinement and analysis.利用超过 801296 个小分子晶体结构来辅助蛋白质结构精修和分析。
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2017 Mar 1;73(Pt 3):234-239. doi: 10.1107/S2059798316014352. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
8
Ligand-binding site prediction of proteins based on known fragment-fragment interactions.基于已知的片段-片段相互作用预测蛋白质的配体结合位点。
Bioinformatics. 2010 Jun 15;26(12):1493-9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq232. Epub 2010 May 13.
9
A medicinal chemist's guide to molecular interactions.分子相互作用的药物化学家指南。
J Med Chem. 2010 Jul 22;53(14):5061-84. doi: 10.1021/jm100112j.
10
Minimal pharmacophoric elements and fragment hopping, an approach directed at molecular diversity and isozyme selectivity. Design of selective neuronal nitric oxide synthase inhibitors.最小药效基团元素与片段跳跃,一种针对分子多样性和同工酶选择性的方法。选择性神经元型一氧化氮合酶抑制剂的设计。
J Am Chem Soc. 2008 Mar 26;130(12):3900-14. doi: 10.1021/ja0772041. Epub 2008 Mar 6.