• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The health care resource allocation debate. Defining our terms.

作者信息

Hadorn D C, Brook R H

机构信息

Department of Social Policy, RAND, Santa Monica, CA 90406.

出版信息

JAMA. 1991 Dec 18;266(23):3328-31.

PMID:1960833
Abstract

The problem of health care distribution in the United States demands immediate action. Many different solutions have been proposed to slow rising health care costs and to improve access to care for the poor and uninsured. Debate among proponents of these various proposals might be advanced if a common language were adopted with regard to certain key terms instead of the various meanings currently assigned to these terms. For this reason, we propose and defend the following three definitions: (1) rationing is the societal toleration of inequitable access to health services acknowledged to be necessary by reference to necessary-care guidelines; (2) health care needs are desires for services that have been reasonably well demonstrated to provide significant net benefit for patients with specified clinical conditions; and (3) basic benefit plans are insurance packages that provide for all and only acknowledged health care needs, again by reference to appropriate clinical guidelines.

摘要

相似文献

1
The health care resource allocation debate. Defining our terms.
JAMA. 1991 Dec 18;266(23):3328-31.
2
Infinite needs--finite resources: the future of healthcare.无限需求——有限资源:医疗保健的未来。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1994 Winter;3(1):83-98.
3
Allocation of resources--to treat or not to treat, and who shall beg the question?资源分配——治疗还是不治疗,而谁又该对此问题负责?
Hosp Ethics. 1993 Nov-Dec;9(6):1-4.
4
Equal access to professional services: medicine.
Bus Prof Ethics J. 1985 Spring-Summer;4(3-4):1-41.
5
The uninsured and the debate over the repeal of the Massachusetts universal health care law.未参保者与马萨诸塞州全民医保法废除之争
JAMA. 1992 Feb 26;267(8):1113-7.
6
Must we forgo informed consent to control health care costs? A response to Mark A. Hall.为控制医疗保健成本,我们必须放弃知情同意权吗?对马克·A·霍尔的回应。
Milbank Q. 1993;71(4):669-76.
7
The courtship of the paying patient.付费患者的求爱行为。 (注:此翻译需结合具体语境来准确理解其确切含义,“courtship”原意为求爱、求婚等,这里结合“付费患者”这样的语境,可能表示类似吸引付费患者的行为等意思 )
J Clin Ethics. 1993 Summer;4(2):124-33.
8
Are we in the lifeboat yet? Allocation and rationing of medical resources.我们登上救生艇了吗?医疗资源的分配与配给。
Soc Res (New York). 1985 Autumn;52(3):607-23.
9
An ethical perspective on health care insurance reform.医疗保险改革的伦理视角。
Am J Law Med. 1993;19(1-2):37-74.
10
Cutting waste by making rules: promises, pitfalls, and realistic prospects.通过制定规则减少浪费:承诺、陷阱与现实前景。
Univ PA Law Rev. 1992 May;140(5):1543-72.

引用本文的文献

1
Rationing in health systems: A critical review.卫生系统中的配给:批判性综述。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017 Aug 27;31:47. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.31.47. eCollection 2017.
2
Necessary health care and basic needs: health insurance plans and essential benefits.必要的医疗保健和基本需求:医疗保险计划和基本福利。
Health Care Anal. 2013 Dec;21(4):355-71. doi: 10.1007/s10728-011-0197-5.
3
Healthcare rationing in Spain: framework, descriptive analysis and consequences.西班牙的医疗资源配给:框架、描述性分析及后果
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(6):537-48. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624060-00002.
4
Should NHS patients be allowed to contribute extra money to their care?国民保健署的病人应该被允许为他们的治疗额外付费吗?
BMJ. 2001 Sep 8;323(7312):563-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7312.563.
5
Application of a general health policy model in the American health care crisis.一种通用健康政策模型在美国医疗保健危机中的应用。
J R Soc Med. 1993 May;86(5):277-81. doi: 10.1177/014107689308600512.
6
Who's in charge here? Maximizing patient benefit and professional authority by physician limit setting.这里谁负责?通过设定医生权限来最大化患者利益和专业权威。
J Gen Intern Med. 1994 Aug;9(8):450-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02599063.