• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于诊断试验准确性评估的荟萃分析的分层回归方法。

A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations.

作者信息

Rutter C M, Gatsonis C A

机构信息

Group Health Cooperative, Center for Health Studies, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2001 Oct 15;20(19):2865-84. doi: 10.1002/sim.942.

DOI:10.1002/sim.942
PMID:11568945
Abstract

An important quality of meta-analytic models for research synthesis is their ability to account for both within- and between-study variability. Currently available meta-analytic approaches for studies of diagnostic test accuracy work primarily within a fixed-effects framework. In this paper we describe a hierarchical regression model for meta-analysis of studies reporting estimates of test sensitivity and specificity. The model allows more between- and within-study variability than fixed-effect approaches, by allowing both test stringency and test accuracy to vary across studies. It is also possible to examine the effects of study specific covariates. Estimates are computed using Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation with publicly available software (BUGS). This estimation method allows flexibility in the choice of summary statistics. We demonstrate the advantages of this modelling approach using a recently published meta-analysis comparing three tests used to detect nodal metastasis of cervical cancer.

摘要

用于研究综合分析的元分析模型的一个重要特性是它们能够兼顾研究内部和研究之间的变异性。目前用于诊断试验准确性研究的元分析方法主要在固定效应框架内进行。在本文中,我们描述了一种用于对报告试验敏感性和特异性估计值的研究进行元分析的分层回归模型。该模型比固定效应方法允许更多的研究间和研究内变异性,因为它允许试验严格性和试验准确性在不同研究中有所变化。还可以检验研究特定协变量的影响。估计值使用公开可用软件(BUGS)通过马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗模拟计算得出。这种估计方法在汇总统计量的选择上具有灵活性。我们通过最近发表的一项比较用于检测宫颈癌淋巴结转移的三种试验的元分析来展示这种建模方法的优势。

相似文献

1
A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations.一种用于诊断试验准确性评估的荟萃分析的分层回归方法。
Stat Med. 2001 Oct 15;20(19):2865-84. doi: 10.1002/sim.942.
2
Validation of the summary ROC for diagnostic test meta-analysis: a Monte Carlo simulation.诊断试验Meta分析中汇总ROC曲线的验证:蒙特卡洛模拟
Acad Radiol. 2003 Jan;10(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80784-5.
3
A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.诊断准确性研究的Meta分析模型的统一
Biostatistics. 2007 Apr;8(2):239-51. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxl004. Epub 2006 May 11.
4
A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies without a gold standard.无金标准的诊断准确性研究的Meta分析模型的统一
Biometrics. 2015 Jun;71(2):538-47. doi: 10.1111/biom.12264. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
5
A mixed effect model for bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies using a copula representation of the random effects distribution.一种使用随机效应分布的Copula表示法对诊断试验准确性研究进行双变量Meta分析的混合效应模型。
Stat Med. 2015 Dec 20;34(29):3842-65. doi: 10.1002/sim.6595. Epub 2015 Aug 2.
6
Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data.Meta-DiSc:一款用于检验准确性数据荟萃分析的软件。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jul 12;6:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-31.
7
Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis.在分层汇总ROC分析中生成的经验贝叶斯估计值与完全贝叶斯分析的估计值非常接近。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Sep;57(9):925-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.019.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.磁共振成像和计算机断层扫描对直肠癌侧方淋巴结转移的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan;24(1):46-52. doi: 10.1007/s10147-018-1349-5. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
9
Bayesian approaches to random-effects meta-analysis: a comparative study.随机效应荟萃分析的贝叶斯方法:一项比较研究。
Stat Med. 1995 Dec 30;14(24):2685-99. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780142408.
10
Epistasis Test in Meta-Analysis: A Multi-Parameter Markov Chain Monte Carlo Model for Consistency of Evidence.荟萃分析中的上位性检验:一种用于证据一致性的多参数马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗模型
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 5;11(4):e0152891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152891. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinicopathologic relevance of EpCAM and CD44 in pancreatic cancer: insights from a meta-analysis.EpCAM和CD44在胰腺癌中的临床病理相关性:一项荟萃分析的见解
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2025 Aug 27;16(1):463. doi: 10.1186/s13287-025-04601-1.
2
Diagnostic accuracy of CT for identifying high-risk colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.CT识别高危结肠癌的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Aug 16. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11844-2.
3
Intraoperative hypotension prediction in cardiac and noncardiac procedures: is HPI truly worthwhile? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
心脏手术和非心脏手术中的术中低血压预测:高敏肌钙蛋白I(HPI)真的值得吗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jul 31;25(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03250-4.
4
The Diagnostic Performance of Screening Instruments for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in Chronic Kidney Disease and Kidney Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.慢性肾脏病和肾衰竭中轻度认知障碍及痴呆筛查工具的诊断性能:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Kidney Med. 2025 May 29;7(8):101037. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2025.101037. eCollection 2025 Aug.
5
Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracies of Procalcitonin and C-Reactive Protein for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Patients with Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.降钙素原和C反应蛋白对肝硬化患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎诊断准确性的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 24;61(7):1134. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071134.
6
Prognostic Accuracy of Red Blood Cell Distribution Width in Predicting Mortality Among Acute Pancreatitis Patients: .红细胞分布宽度在预测急性胰腺炎患者死亡率中的预后准确性:
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2025 May 2;25(1):521-530. doi: 10.18295/2075-0528.2865. eCollection 2025.
7
Deep learning classification models demonstrate high accuracy and clinical potential in radiograph interpretation in the arthroplasty clinical pathway: A systematic review and meta-analysis.深度学习分类模型在关节置换临床路径的X光片解读中显示出高准确性和临床潜力:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jul 13;12(3):e70342. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70342. eCollection 2025 Jul.
8
An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Dynamic Contrast Enhancement and Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Non-Mass Enhancement Lesions.动态对比增强和扩散加权磁共振成像鉴别良性和恶性非肿块强化病变诊断准确性的最新系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 30;14(13):4628. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134628.
9
Comparison of the ability to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus between glycated albumin or fructosamine and hemoglobin A1c-a meta-analysis of diagnostic studies.糖化白蛋白或果糖胺与糖化血红蛋白A1c诊断妊娠期糖尿病能力的比较——诊断性研究的荟萃分析
Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 10;14(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02894-0.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of isolated-check visual evoked potentials for glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.孤立视标视觉诱发电位对青光眼的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 10;25(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-04221-6.