• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期的时间偏好

Time preferences for the very long term.

作者信息

Chapman G B

机构信息

Psychology Department, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8020, USA.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2001 Sep;108(2):95-116. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(01)00030-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0001-6918(01)00030-0
PMID:11569764
Abstract

Many important decisions concern outcomes delayed by decades or centuries. Whereas some economists have argued that inter-generational discount rates should be lower than intra-generational rates, three experiments found that inter- and intra-generational discount rates were quite similar. Experiment 1 found that discount rates for long delays (30-900 years) were lower than those for shorter delays (1-30 years) but that, holding delay constant, discount rates for outcomes occurring to future generations were similar to those for outcomes occurring to the present generation. Experiment 2 compared inter-generational discount rates for three different types of outcomes and found similar discount rates for saving lives, improving health, and financial benefits. Experiment 3 found similar inter-generational discounting of life-saving programs that benefit people close to or distant from the decision maker. These studies indicate that the discount rate applied to outcomes occurring to future generations depends on the length of the time delay but not on other factors.

摘要

许多重要决策涉及几十年甚至几个世纪后才会出现的结果。尽管一些经济学家认为代际贴现率应低于代内贴现率,但三项实验发现,代际贴现率和代内贴现率非常相似。实验1发现,长期延迟(30 - 900年)的贴现率低于短期延迟(1 - 30年)的贴现率,但在延迟时间不变的情况下,未来几代人出现的结果的贴现率与当代人出现的结果的贴现率相似。实验2比较了三种不同类型结果的代际贴现率,发现拯救生命、改善健康和经济收益的贴现率相似。实验3发现,对决策者身边或远方的人有益的救生项目的代际贴现率相似。这些研究表明,应用于未来几代人出现的结果的贴现率取决于时间延迟的长度,而不取决于其他因素。

相似文献

1
Time preferences for the very long term.长期的时间偏好
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2001 Sep;108(2):95-116. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(01)00030-0.
2
The discounting of lives saved in future generations--some empirical results.对后代所挽救生命的贴现——一些实证结果。
Health Econ. 1996 Jul-Aug;5(4):329-32. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199607)5:4<329::AID-HEC213>3.0.CO;2-#.
3
Discounting in health care decision-making: time for a change?医疗保健决策中的贴现:是时候做出改变了吗?
J Public Health Med. 1992 Sep;14(3):250-6.
4
Time preference, time discounting, and smoking decisions.时间偏好、时间贴现与吸烟决策。
J Health Econ. 2007 Sep 1;26(5):927-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.02.004. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
5
[The relationship between intra- and inter-generational exchange and mental health among young and older adults].[年轻人和老年人代内与代际交流与心理健康之间的关系]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2018;65(12):719-729. doi: 10.11236/jph.65.12_719.
6
Normative arguments from experts and peers reduce delay discounting.来自专家和同行的规范性论据会减少延迟折扣。
Judgm Decis Mak. 2012 Sep 1;7(5):568-589.
7
Social time preferences for health and money elicited with a choice experiment.通过选择实验引出的健康和金钱的社会时间偏好。
Value Health. 2010 Jun-Jul;13(4):368-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00681.x. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
8
Discounting life-years: whither time preference?
Health Econ. 1998 Mar;7(2):121-7. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199803)7:2<121::aid-hec318>3.0.co;2-h.
9
On discounting of health gains from human papillomavirus vaccination: effects of different approaches.从 HPV 疫苗接种中获得的健康收益的折扣:不同方法的影响。
Value Health. 2012 May;15(3):562-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
10
Discounting and health benefits.
Health Econ. 1992 Apr;1(1):71-6. doi: 10.1002/hec.4730010110.

引用本文的文献

1
An examination of the relationship between perceptions that cigarette smoking increases the severity of COVID-19 and reduction in smoking during the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from the 2021 ITC Korea Survey.新冠疫情期间吸烟会加重新冠病情的认知与吸烟量减少之间的关系研究:2021年国际烟草控制韩国调查结果
Tob Induc Dis. 2025 Jun 30;23. doi: 10.18332/tid/205468. eCollection 2025.
2
Whether temporal discounting is domain-specific between health outcomes and money: a systematic review and meta-analysis.健康结果与金钱之间的时间贴现是否具有领域特异性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Feb;47(1):31-45. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01846-3. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
3
Effects of Message Framing and Time Discounting on Health Communication for Optimum Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke Prevention (EMT-OCSP): a protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, observer-blinded, 12-month randomised controlled study.
信息框架和时间贴现对最佳心血管疾病和中风预防的健康传播效果(EMT-OCSP):一项实用、多中心、观察者盲法、12 个月随机对照研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 24;11(3):e043450. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043450.
4
Time preferences are reliable across time-horizons and verbal versus experiential tasks.时间偏好是可靠的,跨越时间范围和口头与体验任务。
Elife. 2019 Feb 5;8:e39656. doi: 10.7554/eLife.39656.
5
How costs influence decision values for mixed outcomes.混合结局下成本如何影响决策值。
Front Neurosci. 2012 Oct 26;6:146. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00146. eCollection 2012.
6
Societal discounting of health effects in cost-effectiveness analyses: the influence of life expectancy.成本效益分析中对健康影响的社会贴现:预期寿命的影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(8):791-802. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200523080-00005.