Illei P B, Rosai J, Klimstra D S
Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2001 Oct;125(10):1335-9. doi: 10.5858/2001-125-1335-EOTTFA.
Sclerosing hemangioma of the lung is well characterized histologically, but the line of differentiation expressed by the tumor cells has been unclear. Despite the implication by its name of a vascular neoplasm, sclerosing hemangioma is considered by most authorities to be an epithelial tumor, possibly related to the pulmonary epithelium.
To determine the line of differentiation of the tumor cells with immunohistochemistry and to review the related literature.
Nine cases of histologically typical pulmonary sclerosing hemangioma were studied with pan-epithelial (epithelial membrane antigen [EMA] and CAM 5.2), endothelial (CD31), neuroendocrine (chromogranin A), and pulmonary epithelial markers (thyroid transcription factor-1 and PE10). Staining intensity was separately evaluated in the pale cells of the solid areas and the cells lining the papillary structures.
Both cell types were positive for thyroid transcription factor-1 and EMA in all cases (100%). Thyroid transcription factor-1 showed diffuse strong staining, and EMA staining varied from focal weak to diffuse strong. The pale cells showed focal staining for keratin (CAM 5.2) in 2 (28%) of 7 cases, and for PE10 in 5 (62%) of 8 cases. The papillary lining cells were at least focally positive with CAM 5.2 and PE10 in all cases (100%). Reactions for chromogranin and CD31 were negative in both cell types in every case. The number of PE10- or CAM 5.2-positive papillary lining cells was less than the number of EMA-positive papillary lining cells.
The uniform positivity for EMA is consistent with the notion that the tumor cells of sclerosing hemangioma are epithelial, and the strong thyroid transcription factor-1 positivity suggests differentiation toward pulmonary epithelium. The papillary lining cells expressing EMA as well as PE10 or CAM 5.2 likely represent entrapped metaplastic alveolar epithelium, whereas the papillary lining cells expressing only EMA more likely constitute true neoplastic cells similar to those in the solid areas.
肺硬化性血管瘤在组织学上具有明确特征,但肿瘤细胞的分化谱系尚不清楚。尽管其名称暗示为血管性肿瘤,但大多数权威认为硬化性血管瘤是一种上皮性肿瘤,可能与肺上皮有关。
通过免疫组织化学确定肿瘤细胞的分化谱系并复习相关文献。
对9例组织学典型的肺硬化性血管瘤进行研究,采用全上皮标志物(上皮膜抗原[EMA]和CAM 5.2)、内皮标志物(CD31)、神经内分泌标志物(嗜铬粒蛋白A)以及肺上皮标志物(甲状腺转录因子-1和PE10)。分别评估实性区域淡染细胞和乳头结构内衬细胞的染色强度。
所有病例(100%)的两种细胞类型均对甲状腺转录因子-1和EMA呈阳性。甲状腺转录因子-1呈弥漫性强染色,EMA染色从局灶性弱阳性到弥漫性强阳性不等。7例中的2例(28%)淡染细胞对角蛋白(CAM 5.2)呈局灶性染色,8例中的5例(62%)对PE10呈阳性。所有病例(100%)的乳头内衬细胞至少局灶性表达CAM 5.2和PE10。所有病例中两种细胞类型对嗜铬粒蛋白和CD31的反应均为阴性。PE10或CAM 5.2阳性的乳头内衬细胞数量少于EMA阳性的乳头内衬细胞数量。
EMA的一致阳性支持硬化性血管瘤肿瘤细胞为上皮性的观点,甲状腺转录因子-1的强阳性提示向肺上皮分化。表达EMA以及PE10或CAM 5.2的乳头内衬细胞可能代表陷入的化生肺泡上皮,而仅表达EMA的乳头内衬细胞更可能构成与实性区域相似的真正肿瘤细胞。