Kawahito S, Maeda T, Yoshikawa M, Takano T, Nonaka K, Linneweber J, Mikami M, Motomura T, Ichikawa S, Glueck J, Nosé Y
Baylor College of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Houston, Texas, USA.
ASAIO J. 2001 Sep-Oct;47(5):492-5. doi: 10.1097/00002480-200109000-00019.
Hemolysis remains one of the most serious problems during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS). However, the hemolytic characteristics associated with oxygenators are not well defined. A specialized hemolysis test protocol for oxygenators was developed. A comparative study was performed following this protocol to determine the hemolytic characteristics of the clinically available oxygenators during CPB; pressure drop measurements in the blood chamber were also performed. Four oxygenators (Medtronic Affinity, Cobe Optima, Terumo Capiox SX25, and Bard Quantum) were evaluated. Fresh blood from healthy Dexter calves anticoagulated with citrate phosphate dextrose adenine solution was used. The blood flow was fixed at 5 L/min, similar to that used in CPB. The Normalized Index of Hemolysis for Oxygenators (NIHO) has been modified according to the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards. The NIH value, which was obtained from the circuit without an oxygenator, was subtracted from the primary NIH value, obtained from the circuit with an oxygenator to eliminate the effects of a centrifugal pump or other artifacts. The NIHO value was the lowest in the Affinity (0.0116 +/- 0.0017) and increased from Affinity < Optima (0.0270 +/- 0.0038) < Capiox (0.0335 +/- 0.0028) < Quantum (0.0416 +/- 0.0015 g/100 L). The Optima and Capiox did not demonstrate a significant difference. In addition, this NIHO value has a close relationship to the pressure drop. In conclusion, this new evaluation method is suitable to compare the biocompatibility performance of different types of clinically available oxygenators for CPB usage.
溶血仍然是体外循环(CPB)、体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)和经皮心肺支持(PCPS)过程中最严重的问题之一。然而,与氧合器相关的溶血特性尚未明确界定。为此开发了一种专门用于氧合器的溶血测试方案。按照该方案进行了一项比较研究,以确定CPB期间临床可用氧合器的溶血特性;同时还对血腔中的压降进行了测量。评估了四种氧合器(美敦力Affinity、科倍Optima、泰尔茂Capiox SX25和巴德Quantum)。使用用枸橼酸盐磷酸盐葡萄糖腺嘌呤溶液抗凝的健康德克斯特小牛的新鲜血液。血流固定为5 L/min,与CPB中使用的血流相似。氧合器溶血归一化指数(NIHO)已根据美国材料与试验协会(ASTM)标准进行了修改。从没有氧合器的回路中获得的NIH值,从有氧合器的回路中获得的主要NIH值中减去,以消除离心泵或其他伪影的影响。NIHO值在Affinity中最低(0.0116 +/- 0.0017),并且从Affinity < Optima(0.0270 +/- 0.0038)< Capiox(0.0335 +/- 0.0028)< Quantum(0.0416 +/- 0.0015 g/100 L)依次升高。Optima和Capiox之间没有显著差异。此外,该NIHO值与压降密切相关。总之,这种新的评估方法适用于比较不同类型临床可用氧合器用于CPB时的生物相容性性能。