Friederich M, Trippe R H, Ozcan M, Weiss T, Hecht H, Miltner W H
Department of Biological and Clinical Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Germany.
Psychophysiology. 2001 Sep;38(5):768-76.
Psychological accounts of hypnosis have hypothesized that hypnosis and attention might share similar mechanisms and that hypnosis simply represents an extensive state of reduced attention. This assumption implies that reports of pain and electrocortical brain responses to painful stimulation should be similarly reduced when subjects are exposed to suggestions of hypnotic analgesia (HA) or requested to distract their attention from painful stimuli (distraction of attention: DA) as compared to a control condition (CC). To test this hypothesis, we recorded event-related electrical brain potentials to noxious laser-heat stimuli and pain reports during HA, DA, and CC from subjects highly susceptible to hypnotic suggestions. Pain reports were significantly reduced during HA and DA as compared to CC. The amplitudes of the late laser-evoked brain potential (LEP) components N200 and P320 were also significantly smaller during DA than during CC. However, no significant difference of these late LEP amplitudes was obtained for HA as compared to CC. Results indicate that hypnotic analgesia and distraction of attention represent different mechanisms of pain control and involve different brain mechanisms.
关于催眠的心理学解释曾提出假设,认为催眠与注意力可能具有相似的机制,且催眠仅仅代表一种注意力大幅降低的状态。这一假设意味着,与对照条件(CC)相比,当受试者接受催眠镇痛(HA)暗示或被要求将注意力从疼痛刺激上转移开(注意力分散:DA)时,疼痛报告以及大脑对疼痛刺激的皮层电反应应该会同样减少。为了验证这一假设,我们记录了对有害激光热刺激的事件相关脑电活动以及在HA、DA和CC过程中对极易接受催眠暗示的受试者的疼痛报告。与CC相比,HA和DA过程中的疼痛报告显著减少。与CC相比,DA过程中晚期激光诱发脑电位(LEP)成分N200和P320的波幅也显著更小。然而,与CC相比,HA过程中这些晚期LEP波幅没有显著差异。结果表明,催眠镇痛和注意力分散代表了不同的疼痛控制机制,且涉及不同的脑机制。