Suppr超能文献

基于医院的姑息治疗项目的普及程度如何?现状报告与未来方向。

How prevalent are hospital-based palliative care programs? Status report and future directions.

作者信息

Pan C X, Morrison R S, Meier D E, Natale D K, Goldhirsch S L, Kralovec P, Cassel C K

机构信息

Hertzberg Palliative Care Institute, Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Adult Development, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2001 Fall;4(3):315-24. doi: 10.1089/109662101753123922.

Abstract

In the United States, the majority of deaths occur in the hospital but the dying process there is at best unsatisfactory and more likely inadequate for both patients and caregivers. The development of hospital-based palliative care programs (HBPCPs) can vastly improve inpatient end-of-life care. This study is the first to examine the prevalence and characteristics of HBPCPs in the United States, thus providing a snapshot of the characteristics of these HBPCPs. It also serves as a baseline and benchmark against which future development and patterns of HBPCPs can be compared. Phase 1: Data were obtained from the American Hospital Association (AHA) 1998 Annual Survey, on the existence of end-of-life care (EOLC) and pain management (PM) services in U.S. hospitals. Phase 2: A focused survey further assessed programs in Phase 1 and was sent to all registered hospitals that responded affirmatively to the AHA survey questions as having either a PM service, an EOLC service, or both. In phase 1, 1,751 (36%) hospitals reported having a PM service and 719 (15%) had an EOLC service, for a total of 2,015 unique hospitals that had one or both. For Phase 2, 1,120 of 2,015 responded (56%). Of these, 337 (30%) hospitals reported having an HBPCP, and another 228 (20.4%) had plans to establish one. HBPCPs are most commonly structured as inpatient consultation service and hospital-based hospice. They tend to be based in oncology, general medicine, and geriatrics. We also assessed reasons for consultation, patient characteristics, and future development needs. These findings can help guide future funding, educational, and programming efforts in hospital-based palliative care.

摘要

在美国,大多数死亡发生在医院,但那里的临终过程充其量只能说是不尽人意,对患者和护理人员来说更可能是不充分的。基于医院的姑息治疗项目(HBPCPs)的发展可以极大地改善住院患者的临终护理。本研究首次调查了美国HBPCPs的患病率和特征,从而提供了这些HBPCPs特征的简要情况。它还作为一个基线和基准,可用于比较HBPCPs未来的发展和模式。第一阶段:数据来自美国医院协会(AHA)1998年年度调查,内容是美国医院临终护理(EOLC)和疼痛管理(PM)服务的存在情况。第二阶段:一项重点调查进一步评估了第一阶段的项目,并发送给所有对AHA调查问题给出肯定答复的注册医院,这些医院要么有PM服务,要么有EOLC服务,要么两者都有。在第一阶段,1751家(36%)医院报告有PM服务,719家(15%)有EOLC服务,共有2015家不同的医院有其中一项或两项服务。对于第二阶段,2015家中有1120家做出了回应(56%)。其中,337家(30%)医院报告有HBPCP,另外228家(20.4%)有计划建立一个。HBPCPs最常见的结构是住院咨询服务和医院临终关怀。它们往往设在肿瘤科、普通内科和老年医学科。我们还评估了咨询原因、患者特征和未来发展需求。这些发现有助于指导未来在基于医院的姑息治疗方面的资金、教育和项目努力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验