Bodner-Adler Barbara, Bodner Klaus, Kimberger Oliver, Lozanov Plamen, Husslein Peter, Mayerhofer Klaus
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Vienna Medical School, Vienna, Austria.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2003 Oct 31;115(19-20):720-3. doi: 10.1007/BF03040889.
To assess the maternal, perineal and neonatal outcomes of an upright position compared with a supine position during vaginal delivery, in terms of defined outcome variables.
This case-control study was carried out at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the University Hospital Vienna between 1997 and 2002. A total of 307 women who delivered in an upright position were enrolled in the study. Upright position was defined as free squatting and was also described as an alternative birth position. 307 controls, delivering in a supine position, were selected from the delivery database as the next parity-matched normal spontaneous vaginal delivery. Our analysis was restricted to a sample of women with a gestational age > 37 weeks, a normal sized fetus and a pregnancy with cephalic presentation. Women with medical or obstetric risk factors were excluded.
A statistically significant decrease for the use of medical analgesia (p = 0.0001) and oxytocin (p = 0.001) was observed in women using the upright birth position. The length of the first and second stages of labour did not significantly differ between the two groups (p > 0.05). A significantly lower rate of episiotomy was detected in women who delivered in an upright position compared with women delivering supine (p = 0.0001). The frequency of perineal tears, and vaginal and labial trauma did not differ between the two groups (p > 0.05). When analysing maternal blood loss, no significant differences between the two groups were found (p > 0.05). No differences in APGAR score < 7 at 1 and 5 minutes or cord pH < 7.1 were observed (p > 0.05).
The data indicate that labouring and delivering in an upright position is associated with beneficial effects such as a lower rate of episiotomy, and a reduced use of medical analgesia and oxytocin. In our opinion, the best recommendation is to give low-risk maternity patients the option of bearing in the mode that is most comfortable for them.
根据特定的结局变量,评估阴道分娩时直立位与仰卧位相比的产妇、会阴及新生儿结局。
本病例对照研究于1997年至2002年在维也纳大学医院妇产科进行。共有307名以直立位分娩的妇女纳入研究。直立位定义为自由蹲位,也被描述为一种替代分娩姿势。从分娩数据库中选取307名仰卧位分娩的对照者,作为下一个与之孕周匹配的正常自然阴道分娩者。我们的分析仅限于孕周>37周、胎儿大小正常且为头先露妊娠的妇女样本。排除有医学或产科危险因素的妇女。
观察到采用直立位分娩的妇女使用医学镇痛(p = 0.0001)和催产素(p = 0.001)的情况在统计学上显著减少。两组第一产程和第二产程的时长无显著差异(p > 0.05)。与仰卧位分娩的妇女相比,直立位分娩的妇女会阴切开术发生率显著更低(p = 0.0001)。两组之间会阴撕裂、阴道及阴唇创伤的发生率无差异(p > 0.05)。分析产妇失血量时,两组之间未发现显著差异(p > 0.05)。在1分钟和5分钟时Apgar评分<7或脐血pH<7.1方面未观察到差异(p > 0.05)。
数据表明,直立位分娩与诸如更低的会阴切开术发生率、减少医学镇痛和催产素的使用等有益效果相关。我们认为,最佳建议是给予低风险产妇选择对她们来说最舒适分娩方式的权利。