• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量知识的工具的设计与验证。

Design and validation of instruments to measure knowledge.

作者信息

Elliott T E, Regal R R, Elliott B A, Renier C M

机构信息

Division of Education and Research, St. Mary's/Duluth Clinic Health System, MN 55805, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2001 Autumn;16(3):157-62. doi: 10.1080/08858190109528759.

DOI:10.1080/08858190109528759
PMID:11603879
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Measuring health care providers' learning after they have participated in educational interventions that use experimental designs requires valid, reliable, and practical instruments.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted. In addition, experience gained from designing and validating instruments for measuring the effect of an educational intervention informed this process.

RESULTS

The eight main steps for designing, validating, and testing the reliability of instruments for measuring learning outcomes are presented. The key considerations and rationale for this process are discussed. Methods for critiquing and adapting existent instruments and creating new ones are offered.

CONCLUSIONS

This study may help other investigators in developing valid, reliable, and practical instruments for measuring the outcomes of educational activities.

摘要

背景

在医疗服务提供者参与采用实验设计的教育干预措施后,衡量他们的学习情况需要有效、可靠且实用的工具。

方法

进行了文献综述。此外,在设计和验证用于衡量教育干预效果的工具过程中获得的经验也为这一过程提供了参考。

结果

介绍了设计、验证和测试用于衡量学习成果的工具的可靠性的八个主要步骤。讨论了这一过程的关键考虑因素和基本原理。提供了评估和改编现有工具以及创建新工具的方法。

结论

本研究可能有助于其他研究人员开发有效、可靠且实用的工具来衡量教育活动的成果。

相似文献

1
Design and validation of instruments to measure knowledge.测量知识的工具的设计与验证。
J Cancer Educ. 2001 Autumn;16(3):157-62. doi: 10.1080/08858190109528759.
2
Designing evaluation forms to facilitate student learning.设计评估表以促进学生学习。
J Dent Educ. 2008 Jan;72(1):48-58.
3
The validity and reliability of two asthma knowledge questionnaires.两份哮喘知识问卷的有效性和可靠性。
J Asthma. 2005 Nov;42(9):795-801. doi: 10.1080/02770900500308627.
4
Critical thinking skills of baccalaureate nursing students at program entry and exit.本科护理专业学生入学和毕业时的批判性思维能力。
Nurs Health Care Perspect. 1999 Sep-Oct;20(5):248-52.
5
Health care managers as educational evaluators and accreditation support personnel.
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2010 Jul-Sep;29(3):265-70. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e3181e8e093.
6
The clinical achievement portfolio: an outcomes-based assessment project in nursing education.临床成果组合:护理教育中一项基于结果的评估项目。
Nurse Educ. 2000 Sep-Oct;25(5):241-6.
7
Quality assurance best practices for simulation-based examinations.基于模拟考试的质量保证最佳实践。
Simul Healthc. 2010 Aug;5(4):226-31. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181da5c93.
8
Assessment of interprofessional learning: the design of an interprofessional objective structured clinical examination (iOSCE) approach.跨专业学习评估:跨专业客观结构化临床考试(iOSCE)方法的设计
J Interprof Care. 2011 Jan;25(1):73-4. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2010.483746. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
9
The criteria and analysis of good multiple choice questions in a health professional setting.健康专业背景下优质多项选择题的标准与分析
Saudi Med J. 2005 Oct;26(10):1505-10.
10
Developing disaster preparedness competence: an experiential learning exercise for multiprofessional education.培养灾难应对能力:一项针对多专业教育的体验式学习活动。
Teach Learn Med. 2008 Jan-Mar;20(1):62-8. doi: 10.1080/10401330701798311.