Licari Frank W, Knight G William, Guenzel Pamela J
University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Dentistry, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
J Dent Educ. 2008 Jan;72(1):48-58.
Most dental school instructors struggle to develop course evaluation criteria that can effectively be applied as valid and reliable learning instruments. Vague and unreliable learning assessments often lead to increased dissatisfaction among both faculty and students. Students complain about the "lack of faculty calibration," and faculty are often unable to adequately evaluate competence due to the need to provide an overall course grade by the end of the term. By systematically addressing Mackenzie et al.'s list of sixteen factors that contribute to faculty disagreements on student evaluation, we developed "Criteria for Writing Effective Evaluation Forms" as a guide for developing evaluation criteria. By using the guide for developing evaluation forms for student learning, course directors will have the components necessary to ensure validity and reliability of student assessment methodology. By providing students and faculty with clearly defined criteria and the training to apply those criteria, Mackenzie et al.'s concerns may be conquered.
大多数牙科学校的教师都难以制定出能够有效用作有效且可靠学习工具的课程评估标准。模糊且不可靠的学习评估往往会导致教师和学生双方的不满情绪增加。学生抱怨“教师缺乏校准”,而教师由于需要在学期末给出整体课程成绩,往往无法充分评估学生的能力。通过系统地处理麦肯齐等人列出的导致教师在学生评估上存在分歧的16个因素,我们制定了《编写有效评估表的标准》,作为制定评估标准的指南。通过使用该指南来制定学生学习评估表,课程主任将拥有确保学生评估方法有效性和可靠性所需的要素。通过为学生和教师提供明确界定的标准以及应用这些标准的培训,麦肯齐等人所关注的问题或许能够得到解决。