Gorman P
Division of Medical Informatics and Outcomes Research,Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon 97201, USA.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 1):338-42.
To compare the self-reported information needs of rural and nonrural primary care physicians.
Mail survey of active non-academic primary care physicians.
A 60 item questionnaire regarding 1) demographic and practice setting data; 2) medical information needs; 3) medical knowledge resource availability and use; and 4) physician information seeking behavior.
The response rate was higher among rural than non-rural physicians (55% vs. 42%, p< 0.001) and among Family Physicians than others (Family Medicine 53%, Internal Medicine 43%, Pediatrics 48%, p=0.015.) Rural physicians reported working more hours per week (45.3 vs. 42.7, p=0.033,) and seeing more patients per day (24.6 vs. 22.3, p=0.005) than their nonrural counterparts. Both groups reported a median of about 1 question for every 10 patients they see, with great variance among responses. Both groups reported pursuing answers to about 57% of their questions, and finding answers to about 70% of those they pursue. Knowledge resource preferences of the two groups were similar. Both groups reported frequent use of consultants, drug compendia, colleagues, and textbooks, and little use of library- or computer-based sources. Compared to nonrural physicians, rural physicians reported less frequent use of consultants, colleagues, librarians, and bound journals. These differences were small, and paralleled differences in availability. The two groups had equal access to textbooks and drug compendia, but for rural physicians, other resources were locally available significantly less often.
Rural and nonrural primary care physicians reported equal information needs, similar information seeking, and similar resource preferences. Rural physicians reported less access to some information resources, but little difference in use of resources. Further studies are needed to determine how these differences impact rural practitioners and their patients.
比较农村和非农村基层医疗医生自我报告的信息需求。
对在职非学术基层医疗医生进行邮件调查。
一份包含60个条目的问卷,内容涉及1)人口统计学和执业环境数据;2)医学信息需求;3)医学知识资源的可得性及使用情况;4)医生的信息寻求行为。
农村医生的回复率高于非农村医生(55%对42%,p<0.001),家庭医生的回复率高于其他医生(家庭医学53%,内科43%,儿科48%,p=0.015)。农村医生报告称每周工作时间更长(45.3小时对42.7小时,p=0.033),每天看诊的患者更多(24.6名对22.3名,p=0.005)。两组医生均报告称,每看诊10名患者大约会提出1个问题,回复差异很大。两组医生均报告称,约57%的问题会寻求答案,其中约70%能找到答案。两组医生对知识资源的偏好相似。两组医生均报告经常使用咨询顾问、药品手册、同事和教科书,很少使用图书馆或基于计算机的资源。与非农村医生相比,农村医生报告较少使用咨询顾问、同事、图书管理员和装订期刊。这些差异很小,与资源可得性的差异相似。两组获取教科书和药品手册的机会均等,但对农村医生而言,其他资源在当地的可得性明显更低。
农村和非农村基层医疗医生报告的信息需求、信息寻求行为和资源偏好相同。农村医生报告称获取某些信息资源的机会较少,但资源使用差异不大。需要进一步研究以确定这些差异如何影响农村从业者及其患者。