Alter J S
University of Pittsburgh, Pa.
Curr Anthropol. 1999 Feb;40 Suppl:S43-s56. doi: 10.1086/200060.
Because most scholars take it for granted that medicine is concerned with healing and problems of ill health, the way in which various medical systems define good health has not been adequately studied. Moreover, good health as such is usually regarded as a natural, normative state of being even by most medical anthropologists, who otherwise take a critical, relativist perspective on the subject of illness, pain, and disease. Using the case of Ayurvedic medicine, this article shows that there is a very different way of looking at the question of how health is embodied. This perspective is proactive and concerned with overall fitness rather than reactive and primarily concerned with either illness or disease. The argument presented here therefore seeks to go beyond the limiting--although extremely useful--orientation of remedial health care and suggest a radical challenge to some of the most basic ontological assumptions in the cross-cultural comparative study of medical systems.
由于大多数学者想当然地认为医学关乎治愈和健康问题,所以各种医学体系界定健康的方式尚未得到充分研究。此外,即便大多数医学人类学家在疾病、疼痛和病症问题上持批判性的相对主义观点,但他们通常也将健康本身视为一种自然的、规范的存在状态。本文以阿育吠陀医学为例,表明看待健康如何体现这一问题存在截然不同的方式。这种观点是积极主动的,关注整体健康状况,而非被动反应式的,主要关注疾病或病症。因此,本文提出的论点旨在超越补救性医疗保健虽极为有用但却具有局限性的取向,并对医学体系跨文化比较研究中的一些最基本的本体论假设提出根本性挑战。